Yargı organlarınca, yargılamanın sağlıklı biçimde yürütülüp sonuçlandırılabilmesi için davaya konu uyuşmazlığa ait ispat araçlarının, davanın taraflarınca yargılama makamına sunulması gerekmektedir. Bu süreçte hâkim gerekli gördüğü hallerde tarafların sunduğu davaya ait bilgi ve belgeler yanında yargılamanın ve kurulacak hükmün isabetli olabilmesi için re’sen araştırma ilkesinden yararlanabilmektedir. Hukuk sistemimizdeki bu ilke ile hâkimlere, baktığı davaya ilişkin doğru, özgür, sağlıklı kararlar vermesini sağlayacak geniş yetki ve görevler verilse de bu yetkiler sınırsız değildir. Özellikle hukuka uygunluk, yerindelik denetimi yapılamaması, ispat, devletin güvenliği veya yüksek menfaatlerine ilişkin sınırlar, mükellef hakları, vergi mahremiyeti vb. konular hâkimin yargılama sırasında doğrudan olduğu kadar dolaylı sınırlarının varlığını da ortaya koymaktadır.
In order for the trial to be conducted and concluded in a healthy manner by the judicial bodies, the evidence of the dispute in the case must be presented to the judicial authority by the parties to the case. In this process, the judge may take advantage of the re'sen investigation principle in cases where it is necessary, in addition to the information and documents of the case provided by the parties, in order for the trial and the judgment to be established to be valid. With this principle in our legal system, the judges are given broad powers and duties to ensure that they make correct, free and healthy decisions on the case they are considering, but these powers are not unlimited. Specifically, legal conformity, the impossibility to carry out local controls, evidence, limits relating to the security of the state or the high interests, the rights of the contractor, tax privacy, etc. The subjects also reveal the existence of the direct and indirect limits of the judge during the trial.
By the judicial organs, the means of proof of the dispute subject to the case must be submitted to the judicial authority by the parties of the case so that the trial can be conducted and concluded in a healthy manner. In this process, when the judge deems necessary, besides the information and documents of the case presented by the parties, the judge can make use of the principle of ex officio examination in order to make the judgment and the verdict to be established. With this principle in our legal system, the judges, regarding the case they deal with; broad powers and duties are given to enable it to make correct, free and healthy decisions, but these powers are not unlimited. Especially, the issues such as compliance with the law, lack of appropriateness control, proof, limits on the security or best interests of the state, taxpayer rights, tax privacy, etc. reveal the existence of direct as well as indirect limits during the trial of the judge.
Alan : Sosyal, Beşeri ve İdari Bilimler
Dergi Türü : Uluslararası
Benzer Makaleler | Yazar | # |
---|
Makale | Yazar | # |
---|