Citation Number
2
Views
51
Downloands
14
Bu çalışmanın amacı Düşünce Kontrol Yeteneği Ölçeği’nin (DKYÖ-25 ve DKYÖ-8) Türk kültürüne uyarlamak ve ölçeğin psikometrik özelliklerini incelemektir. Araştırma, üç farklı çalışma grubunda yer alan ve yaşları 18 ile 44 arasında değişen toplam 656 (204+255+201) yetişkin katılımcıdan oluşmaktadır. İlk çalışmada, açımlayıcı faktör analizi sonuçlarına göre 25 maddelik DKYÖ’nün orijinalinde olduğu gibi Türkçe formunun da tek boyuta sahip olduğu ve toplam varyansın %42.49’unu açıkladığı görülmüştür. Yapılan DFA sonucu ölçeğin uyum iyiliği değerleri χ²/sd=2.91, RMSEA= .066, CFI= .92, GFI= .93, IFI= .93, NFI= .93, RFI= .94 ve SRMR= .042 şeklinde hesaplanmıştır. Madde faktör yükleri ise .31 ile .69 arasında sıralanmaktadır. Eşdeğer ölçek (ölçüt) geçerliği çalışmasında DKYÖ-25 ile Tekrarlayıcı Düşünme Ölçeği arasında p<.01 önem düzeyinde r=-.62, DKYÖ ile Bilişsel esneklik (alternatifler) ve Bilişsel esneklik (kontrol) arasında p<.01 önem düzeyinde sırasıyla r=.53; .65 pozitif ilişkiler bulunmuştur. Ölçeğin iç tutarlık katsayısı .93 olarak tespit edilmiştir. Düzeltilmiş madde toplam korelasyon katsayıları .37 ile .70 arasında hesaplanmıştır. İkinci çalışmada, AFA’ya göre 8 maddelik DKYÖ’nün tek boyutlu olduğu ve bu tek boyutu ölçeğin toplam varyansın %55’ini açıkladığı tespit edilmiştir. Ölçeğin doğrulayıcı faktör analizine göre ölçeğin uyum iyiliği değerleri χ²/sd=1.98, CFI= .97, GFI= .93, IFI= .97, NFI= .95, RFI= .93 ve SRMR= .048 şeklinde bulunmuştur. Ayrıca madde faktör yükleri .58 ile .77 arasında değişmektedir. Ölçeğin iç tutarlık katsayısı .88 şeklinde hesaplanmıştır. Düzeltilmiş madde toplam korelasyon katsayıları .56 ile .71 arasında değişmektedir. Tüm bu sonuçlar, Düşünce Kontrol Yeteneği Ölçeği’nin Uzun ve Kısa sürümünün Türk yetişkinlerde kullanılabilecek geçerli ve güvenilir bir ölçme aracı olduğunu göstermiştir.
The aim of this study is to adapt to the Turkish culture of the Thought Control Skills Scale (DKYÖ-25 and DKYÖ-8) and to study the psychometric characteristics of the scale. The study consists of a total of 656 (204+255+201) adult participants in three different study groups and aged between 18 and 44. In the first study, it was found that according to the results of the distinctive factor analysis, as in the original of the 25 material DKYÖ, the Turkish form also has one-dimensional and explains 42.49% of the total variance. The result of the DFA is calculated in the conformity value of the scale in χ2/sd=2.91, RMSEA= .066, CFI= .92, GFI= .93, IFI= .93, NFI= .93, RFI= .94 and SRMR= .042. The substance factor load is ranged between .31 and .69. In the validity study of the equal scale (mass) there were positive relationships between the DKYÖ-25 and the Repeatable Thought Scale at p<.01 level of importance r=-.62, the DKYÖ and the Cognitive Flexibility (alternatives) and the Cognitive Flexibility (control) at p<.01 level of importance respectively r=.53; .65. The internal consistency ratio of the measurement is .93. The total correlation ratio of the modified substance is calculated between .37 and .70. In the second study, the AFA found that the eight components of the DKYÖ were one-dimensional and that this one-dimensional indicated 55% of the total variance of the scale. According to the verifying factor analysis of the scale, the conformity well-being values of the scale were found in the form of χ2/sd=1.98, CFI= .97, GFI= .93, IFI= .97, NFI= .95, RFI= .93 and SRMR= .048. It is also the material factor load with .58 . varied from 77. The internal consistency ratio of the measure is calculated in .88. The total correlation ratio of the modified material varies between .56 and .71. All these findings have shown that the Long and Short version of the Thought Control Skill is a valid and reliable measurement tool that can be used in Turkish adults.
The purpose of this study is to adapt The Thought Control Ability Questionnaire (DKYÖ-25 and DKYÖ-8) to Turkish culture and to evaluate the psychometric properties of the questionnaire. The study consists of a total of 656 adult participants (204+255+201) aged between 18 and 44 in three different study groups. In the first study, it was observed that the Turkish form of the 25-item Thought Control Ability Questionnaire (TCAQ), as in the original, had only one dimension explaining 42.49% of the total variance according to the results of exploratory factor analysis. According to the confirmatory factor analysis result, the goodness fit values of the scale are χ²/sd=2.91, RMSEA= .066, CFI= .92, GFI= .93, IFI= .93, NFI= .93, RFI= .94 ve SRMR= .042. Item factor loads are ranked between .31 and .69. In the study of equivalent scale (criterion) validity, between the Thought Control Ability Questionnaire (TCAQ-25) and the Repetitive Thinking Scale, p<.01 severity level of r=-.62 and between Thought Control Ability Questionnaire (TCAQ) and cognitive flexibility (alternatives) and cognitive flexibility (control) at the p<.01 severity level, respectively, r=.53 and r=.65 positive relationships have been found. The internal consistency coefficient of the scale was determined as .93. The total correlation coefficients of the corrected items were calculated between .37 and .70. In the second study, according to exploratory factor analysis (EFA), it was found that the 8-item Thought Control Ability Questionnaire (TCAQ) was one-dimensional and this one-dimensional explained 55% of the total variance of the scale. According to confirmatory factor analysis, the goodness fit values of the scale were found as χ2/sd=1.98, CFI= .97, GFI= .93, IFI= .97, NFI= .95, RFI= .93 and SRMR= 0.48. Also, the item factor loads range from .58 to .77. The internal reliability coefficient of the scale was calculated as .88. The total correlation coefficients of the adjusted items range from .56 to .71. All these results proved that both the long and short version of the Thought Control Ability Questionnaire was a valid and reliable measurement tool that could be used in Turkish adults.
Field : Eğitim Bilimleri
Journal Type : Uluslararası
Article Detail 
Citation Owners
Similar Articles
Download PDF
Journal Information
Listen Paper
Print This Page
Share
Mendeley
