Özet:

The work named as Sharh al-Aqâid, written about ‘Aqâid al-Nasafî by Sa’ad al-Din al Taftâzânî (d. 792/1390), is noteworthy as one of the most well known examples of annotation tradition. This work, with great importance in classical kalam history, was sought after a lot by Ottoman scholars and was has been read as a text-book in madrasas shaping the curriculum. Based on this importance, the work named Sharh al-Aqâid was analysed and investigated and some conclusions were derived from. According to this, it is possible to mention about the use of a narration present in the work. However, it is seen that these narrations concentrated in parts where mostly the hearings and various issues were investigated. On the other hand, it was determined that great majority of the hadiths used in the work was quoted from the first period hadith sources and that nearly two third of them were accurate and hasen. Taftâzânî, who took the narrations without mentioning attribution, a method different from hadith scholars, sometimes used hadith with takti’ and citation method and also gave place to shevâhid-mutebaat type narrations. In terms of understanding the hadiths, Taftâzânî, who adopted commentary approach rather than verbal approach, even rarely, applied Qur’an and sunna presentation methods, the two of the text criticizing criteria, while giving meaning to the hadiths. Joining significant discussions in terms of the informative value of the news, Taftâzânî emphasized that haber-i vâhid (narration from one reporter) was not abstractly an evidence in belief. However, despite this approach, he used such news as evidence in many parts of his work.

Anahtar Kelimeler: