User Guide
Why can I only view 3 results?
You can also view all results when you are connected from the network of member institutions only. For non-member institutions, we are opening a 1-month free trial version if institution officials apply.
So many results that aren't mine?
References in many bibliographies are sometimes referred to as "Surname, I", so the citations of academics whose Surname and initials are the same may occasionally interfere. This problem is often the case with citation indexes all over the world.
How can I see only citations to my article?
After searching the name of your article, you can see the references to the article you selected as soon as you click on the details section.
 ASOS INDEKS
  Citation Number 1
 Views 17
Investigation of the contribution of concentrated growth factor (CGF) and processed lipoaspirate (PLA) to wound healing in diabetic rats
2021
Journal:  
Journal of Health Sciences and Medicine
Author:  
Abstract:

Aim: The aim of the study is to show the effectiveness of concentrated growth factor (CGF) and processed lipoaspirate (PLA) in wound healing in diabetic rats. Materyal and Method: A total of 30 rats were used in the study. İt was divided into 3 groups as CGF, PLA and control group. The rats were made diabetic using Sreptozotocin IP. A 5mm diameter wound was created on one of the hind legs of all rats by using a punch. CGF and PLA were applied to the lesions. Daily wound size and wound condition were recorded on days 3, 5 and 10. At the end of the study, blood samples were taken for TNF-α, TGF-β, IL-1, PDGF, FGF and VEGF measurements before the rats were sacrificed. Results: The mean wound diameters measured on the 3rd day in the study were 4.6 ± 0.06 mm in the control group, 4.1 ± 0.05 mm in the CGF group, and 4.4 ± 0.07 mm in the PLA group. The wound diameters measured on the 5th day were 3.1 ± 0.04 mm in the control group, 1.6 ± 0.05 mm in the CGF group and 2.7 ± 0.06 mm in the PLA group (P <0.01). The mean closure time of wounds was 5.3 ± 1.1 days in the CGF group, 7.1 ± 1.4 days in the PLA group, and 9.4 ± 0.5 days in the control group. All of the wounds were healed in all groups on the 10th day. This improvement rate in the CGF group was statistically significant compared to the other two groups (p<0.01). CGF and PLA increased the speed of wound healing in diabetic rats. Inflammatory marker levels (TNF-α, TGF-β, IL-1, PDGF, FGF, VEGF) obtained from blood samples were higher than normal in all rats and there was no significant difference between the groups (p>0.05). Conclusion: In this study, it was shown that CGF application was more effective than PLA application in wound healing in diabetic rats.

Keywords:

Citation Owners
Attention!
To view citations of publications, you must access Sobiad from a Member University Network. You can contact the Library and Documentation Department for our institution to become a member of Sobiad.
Off-Campus Access
If you are affiliated with a Sobiad Subscriber organization, you can use Login Panel for external access. You can easily sign up and log in with your corporate e-mail address.
Similar Articles








Journal of Health Sciences and Medicine

Journal Type :   Uluslararası

Journal of Health Sciences and Medicine