User Guide
Why can I only view 3 results?
You can also view all results when you are connected from the network of member institutions only. For non-member institutions, we are opening a 1-month free trial version if institution officials apply.
So many results that aren't mine?
References in many bibliographies are sometimes referred to as "Surname, I", so the citations of academics whose Surname and initials are the same may occasionally interfere. This problem is often the case with citation indexes all over the world.
How can I see only citations to my article?
After searching the name of your article, you can see the references to the article you selected as soon as you click on the details section.
  Citation Number 2
 Views 24
 Downloands 1
Metin Madenciliği Yöntemiyle Dijital Katılım Analizi ve 2017 Türkiye Sosyal Medya Referandumu
2022
Journal:  
Acta Infologica
Author:  
Abstract:

Sosyal ağlar günümüzde pek çok alanda toplulukları yönlendirici unsur haline gelmiştir. Twitter bu ağlar içerisinde anlık gündem belirleyen en önemli platformlardan birisidir. Özellikle son on yılda dünyanın her ülkesinde siyasi süreçlerde de sosyal ağlardan faydalanılmaktadır. Gerek siyasi partilerin propagandalarını yönetmeleri gerekse de halkın görüşlerini dile getirmesi açısından sosyal ağlar önemli platformlar haline gelmiştir. Buradan yola çıkarak Türkiye’de 2017 yılında gerçekleştirilen Referandum sürecinde Twitter üzerinde bir metin madenciliği çalışması gerçekleştirilmiştir. Çalışmada toplumun Twitter aracılığıyla paylaştığı görüşler incelenmiş ve siyasi süreçlerin etkililiğinin ortaya çıkarılması amaçlanmıştır. Bu amaç doğrultusunda referandumun tercih seçenekleri olan evet/hayır görüşleri, siyasi partileri ve siyasi parti liderlerini içeren görüşlerin oranları karşılıklı olarak analiz edilmiştir. Bu analizlerle, sosyal siber istihbaratta örnek teşkil edebilecek bir çalışma gerçekleştirilmiş ve politika belirleyiciler için karar destek sistemlerinin potansiyelleri ortaya çıkarılmıştır.

Keywords:

Analysis Of Digital Participation With Text Mining Method and 2017 Turkey Social Media Referendum
2022
Journal:  
Acta Infologica
Author:  
Abstract:

Social networks have recently become a guiding factor for communities in many areas. Twitter is one of the most important platforms on the social network for setting instant agendas among these networks. Especially in the last decade, social networks have been used in political processes globally. Social networks have become important platforms for political parties to manage their propaganda and for the public to express their opinion. Based on this, a text mining study was carried out on Twitter during Turkey’s 2017 referendum process. In the study, public opinions posted on Twitter were examined to reveal the effectiveness of political processes. For this purpose, the ratios of yes/no opinions, political parties, and political party leaders were analyzed, which are the preferred options of the referendum. With these analyses, an empirical study on social-cyber intelligence was carried out, and the potential of decision support systems for policymakers was revealed.

Keywords:

Citation Owners
Attention!
To view citations of publications, you must access Sobiad from a Member University Network. You can contact the Library and Documentation Department for our institution to become a member of Sobiad.
Off-Campus Access
If you are affiliated with a Sobiad Subscriber organization, you can use Login Panel for external access. You can easily sign up and log in with your corporate e-mail address.
Similar Articles








Acta Infologica

Journal Type :   Uluslararası

Metrics
Article : 101
Cite : 124
Acta Infologica