Atıf Sayısı
1
Görüntüleme
5
Amaç: Bu çalışmanın amacı, kömür madeni işçilerinde bireysel sigara bırakma BSBM ve grup sigara bırakma GSBM müdahalesinin sigara bırakma üzerindeki etkisini karşılaştırmaktır.Gereç ve Yöntemler: Çalışma iki aşamadan oluşmuştur. Çalışmaya katılmayı kabul eden 1045 kömür madeni işçisinin 877'si çalışmanın ilk aşamasında örneklemi oluşturmuştur. Randomize kontrollü çalışma olarak planlanan 2. aşamada ise, 877 kömür madeni işçisinin 126'sı ikinci aşamaya alındı. Sigarayı bırakmaya hazır olan işçiler, her biri BSBM ve GSBM gibi basit rastgele yöntemlerle 63’er kişilik iki gruba randomize edildi. Bulgular: İlk aşamada; 877 kömür madeni işçisinin %59,6ʼsının sigara içtiği tespit edilmiştir. İkinci aşamada; Sigara bırakmaya hazırlanan, eğitim ve danışmanlık almayı kabul eden 126 işçiden BSBM grubunda ki 63 işçi ve GSBM grubunda ki 63 işçilerin sigara bırakma düzeyleri arasında fark bulunmamıştır p>0,05 . Buna karşın hem BSBM, hem de GSBM grubundaki işçilerden Vareniklin veya Bupropion kullananlar işçiler ilaç kullanmayan işçilere göre anlamlı düzeyde daha yüksek oranda sigarayı bırakmışlardır p
Purpose: The aim of this study is to compare the impact of individual smoking cessation BSBM and group smoking cessation GSBM intervention on smoking cessation in coal mining workers. 877 of 1045 coal mining workers who agreed to participate in the study formed a sample in the first stage of the study. In the 2nd phase of planned randomized controlled work, 126 of the 877 coal miners were taken to the 2nd phase. Workers who were ready to quit smoking were randomized to two groups of 63 people, each by simple random methods such as BSBM and GSBM. In the first phase, 877 coal mining workers found that 59.6 percent of them smoked. In the second phase; from 126 workers prepared to quit smoking, who agreed to receive training and consultation, 63 workers in the BSBM group and 63 workers in the GSBM group have no difference between the levels of quit smoking p>0,05 . However, both BSBM and GSBM workers who use Vareniklin or Bupropion have stopped smoking at a significant higher rate than those who do not use drugs.
Objective: The aim of this study was to compare the effect of individual smoking cessation ISCI and group smoking cessation GSCI intervention on smoking cessation in coal miners.Material and Methods: The work consisted of two phases. Of the 1045 coal miners who agreed to participate in the study, 877 were included in the first phase of the study while 126 of these 877 were then recruited to the second stage of the study planned as a randomized controlled trial. Workers who were ready to quit smoking were randomized into two groups of 63 subjects each as ISCI and GSCI with simple randomization methods. Results: In the first phase, 59.6% of the 877 coal miners were found to smoke. In the second stage, there was no difference between the smoking cessation levels of 63 workers in the ISCI group and 63 workers in the GSCI group among the 126 workers who were prepared to quit smoking and who agreed to receive training and counseling p>0.05 . In contrast, both ISCI and GSCI group workers who used Varenicline or Bupropion quit smoking at a significantly higher rate than workers who did
Alan : Sağlık Bilimleri
Dergi Türü : Uluslararası
Makale Detay 
Atıf Yapanlar
Benzer Makaleler
PDF Görüntüle
Dergi Bilgisi
Eseri Dinleyin
Bu Sayfayı Yazdırın
Paylaş
Mendeley
