User Guide
Why can I only view 3 results?
You can also view all results when you are connected from the network of member institutions only. For non-member institutions, we are opening a 1-month free trial version if institution officials apply.
So many results that aren't mine?
References in many bibliographies are sometimes referred to as "Surname, I", so the citations of academics whose Surname and initials are the same may occasionally interfere. This problem is often the case with citation indexes all over the world.
How can I see only citations to my article?
After searching the name of your article, you can see the references to the article you selected as soon as you click on the details section.
 Views 27
 Downloands 4
A comparison of pre-procedure magnesium sulphate and fentanyl citrate for total intravenous anesthesia with propofol in patients undergoing intracavitary brachytherapy for carcinoma of cervix
2015
Journal:  
Asian Pacific Journal of Health Sciences
Author:  
Abstract:

objectives: Intracavitary radiotherapy (ICR) is a form of brachytherapy used in treatment of early or locally confined cervical cancer. This study was undertaken to study the comparison of combination of intravenous Inj. magnesium sulphate and Inj. propofol with Inj. fentanyl citrate and Inj.propofol in patients undergoing intracavitary brachytherapy for locally confined carcinoma of cervix under total intravenous anesthesia. Material and method: Fifty patients belonging to ASA I and ASA II were randomly divided into two groups. Group M received i.v magnesium sulphate 30mg/kg, ten minutes before procedure and group F received i.v fentanyl citrate 1µg/kg ten minutes before procedure. Group M received Magnesium sulphate 10mg/kg/hr by continuous i.v infusion during the procedure. Group F received same amount of isotonic saline. For induction injection propofol, 1-2mg/kg was given intravenously. Anaesthesia was maintained with i.v. propofol 1mg/kg as and when required in incremental doses. We monitored pulse, blood pressure, ECG and SPO2 at preprocedure, during procedure, at the end of procedure, 5mins, 10 mins and 30 mins in recovery room. Patients were observed for nausea, vomiting, sedation, shivering and visual analogue scale score for measurement of severity of pain. We observed total amount of propofol required during the procedure. Results: The total amount of propofol required in group M(130±19.09mg) was less as compared to group F (172.8±29.09mg).That was statistically significant(P=0.0187). Both the groups were similar in hemodynamic stability in terms of systolic and diastolic blood pressures, mean arterial pressure and heart rate throughout the procedure. Postoperative visual analogue scale score and satisfaction score were similar in both groups. Sedation score was higher in group F as compared to group M (P <0.05).Incidence of nausea, vomiting, shivering were less in group M as compared to group F. Conclusion: Preoperative administration of i.v. magnesium sulphate reduces propofol requirement and reduces incidence of nausea, vomiting, shivering and sedation in post-operative period. Hence magnesium sulphate can be used in place of fentanyl citrate, where fentanyl citrate is contraindicated.

Keywords:

Citation Owners
Information: There is no ciation to this publication.
Similar Articles












Asian Pacific Journal of Health Sciences

Field :   Sağlık Bilimleri

Journal Type :   Uluslararası

Metrics
Article : 1.419
Cite : 364
Asian Pacific Journal of Health Sciences