Views
10
Downloands
2
DÜZELTME YAZISI: Dergimizin 11. Cilt 3. Sayı 231-234 sayfaları arası, “10.21601/ortadogutipdergisi.456084” DOI numarası ile, https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/pub/ortadogutipdergisi/issue/46899/456084 internet adresinde yayımlanan “Pfapa sendromunda yeni öngörücü parametreler: nötrofil lenfosit oranı ve trombosit lenfosit oranı” isimli makalede bulunan bazı hatalar, yazarlar tarafından fark edilmiştir. Bu makale, orijinal makalede yer alan hataların giderilmesi amacı ile hazırlanmış düzeltilmiş versiyondur. Amaç: Bu çalışmada PFAPA sendromu tanısı konulan hastalar ile sağlıklı bireyler yeni inflamasyon belirteçlerinden olan nötrofil-lenfosit oranı (NLO) ve trombosit-lenfosit oranı (TLO) bakımından karşılaştırıldı. Gereç ve Yöntem: Çalışmaya PFAPA sendromu tanısı konulmuş 30 hasta (Pf grubu) (16 erkek, 14 kadın ort. yaş 3,33 dağılım 1-21 yıl) ile 30 sağlıklı birey (15 erkek, 15 kadın ort. yaş 4,01 yıl dağılım 1-23 yıl) (kontrol grubu) dahil edildi. Her iki grubun hematolojik parametreleri istatiksel olarak karşılaştırıldı. Nötrofil, lenfosit, trombosit değerleri ile NLO ve TLO oranları kullanıldı. Bulgular: Nötrofil, lenfosit ve trombosit değerleri karşılaştırıldığında Pf ve kontrol grubu arasında bir fark gözlenmedi (p>0.05). NLO oranları karşılaştırıldığında Pf grubunda (p=0,012) istatiksel olarak anlamlı yükseklik saptandı. TLO oranları karşılaştırıldığında ise istatiksel fark gözlenmedi (p=0,117). Sonuç: PFAPA sendromu tanısı genellikle klinik olarak konulmaktadır. Ancak tanısı zor konan vakalarda NLO oranı bir laboratuvar bulgusu olarak yardımcı olabilir.
Reviews: The 11th magazine. The 3rd. The number 231-234 pages, with the DOI number "10.21601/ortadogutipdergisi.456084" and https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/pub/ortadogutipdergisi/issue/46899/456084, some errors in the article "New predictive parameters in Pfapa syndrome: neutrophil lymphocytes rate and trombocytes lymphocytes rate" have been noticed by the authors. This article is a corrected version prepared in order to fix the errors in the original article. Purpose: In this study, patients diagnosed with PFAPA syndrome and healthy individuals were compared in terms of the neutrophil-lenfocytes (NLO) and the trombocytes-lenfocytes (TLO) for new inflammatory indicators. Tools and Methods: 30 patients diagnosed with PFAPA syndrome (Pf group) (16 men, 14 women; ort. Age 3.33; distribution 1-21 years) with 30 healthy individuals (15 men, 15 women; average. Age 4,01 years; distribution 1-23 years) (control group) was included. The hematological parameters of both groups were compared statistically. NLOs and TLOs were used with neutrophil, lymphocytes, thrombocytes values. Results: There was no difference between Pf and the control group when compared the neutrophil, lymphocytes and thrombocytes values (p>0.05). When compared the NLO rates, a statistically meaningful height was determined in the Pf group (p=0,012). When compared the TLO rates, there was no statistical difference (p=0.117). The diagnosis of PFAPA syndrome is usually clinically placed. However, in cases that are difficult to diagnose, the NLO ratio can help as a laboratory finding.
ERRATUM NOTICE: Some errors in the article entitled “New predictive parameters of Pfapa syndrome: neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio and platelet to lymphocyte ratio” which was previously published in Vol. 11 No. 3 pp. 231-244 with DOI “10.21601/ortadogutipdergisi.456084” at https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/pub/ortadogutipdergisi/issue/46899/456084 was recognized by the authors. This article is the corrected version of the original article. Objective: In this study, neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) and platelet-lymphocyte ratio (PLR), which are new markers of inflammation, were compared between patients diagnosed with PFAPA syndrome and healthy individuals. Material and Method: Thirty patients (Pf group) (16 males, 14 females; mean age 3.33; range 1-21 years) diagnosed with PFAPA syndrome and 30 healthy individuals (15 males, 15 females; mean age 4.01 years; range 1-23 years) (control group) were included in the study. Hematologic parameters of both groups were compared statistically. Neutrophil, lymphocyte, platelet values and NLR and TLO ratios were used for comparison. Results: When neutrophil, lymphocyte and platelet values were compared, no difference was observed between Pf and control groups (p> 0.05). When the NLR ratios were compared, a statistically significant increase was detected in the Pf group (p = 0.012). When the PLR ratios were compared, no statistical difference was observed (p = 0.117). Conclusion: PFAPA syndrome is usually diagnosed clinically. However, in diagnosis of difficult clinical cases, the rate of NLR may be helpful as a laboratory finding.
Field : Sağlık Bilimleri
Journal Type : Ulusal
Article Detail 
Similar Articles
Download PDF
Journal Information
Listen Paper
Cite
Print This Page
Share
Mendeley
