Özet:

The aim of this study is to reveal the perception of health workers about social markings in the epidemic process and their assessments about the epidemic process. Method - A measurement tool is created to assess the perception of social markings of health workers. The survey was conducted through an electronic form of survey, with a total of 151 participants reached. The data obtained are assessed by quality and quantum methods. In the evaluation of Nicel data, the IBM SPSS 24.0 package program was used, and the quality data was evaluated by themes created by phenomenological methods. Results- There is a relationship between the lower dimensions of the scale, in general, in the middle and in the positive direction, in addition to the size of professional reputation. The other findings found that 51.2% of health workers experienced social marks. The results of the T-test show that the scale total score and sub-dimensions do not differ according to gender and civic status, and the results of the ANOVA Test also show that the same variables do not differ according to age groups and educational status (p>0.05). In comparisons between the professional groups, the group of technicians and technicians was shown to differ negatively from nurses (p<0.05). As a result of quality assessments, health workers have seen the most people stay away from themselves and the injustice in their payments processes as negative conditions. It is important to work towards increasing social awareness about the causes and negative consequences of social marking. It is believed that studies should be carried out to improve self-sensation in health workers to reduce the perception of social markings, which have a significant negative impact in the long term. The reduction of negative feelings and thoughts in health workers, which are the main actor in the point ofining the quality of the service in the process of providing health services, is an important issue that should not be neglected outside the epidemic process.

Anahtar Kelimeler:

Özet:

Purpose- In this study, it is aimed to reveal the perception about social stigmatization in the epidemic process and the evaluations of healthcare professionals on this issue. Methodology- In order to evaluate the social stigma perception of healthcare professionals, a measurement tool specific to this study was created. The research was carried out through the questionnaire form created electronically, reaching a total of 151 participants. The data obtained were evaluated by qualitative and quantitative methods. In the evaluation of quantitative data, IBM SPSS 24.0 package program was used, and qualitative data were evaluated with the themes created by the phenomenological method. Findings- In addition to the professional reputation dimension, there is a medium and positive relationship between the sub-dimensions of the scale. Another finding obtained in the scope of the research is that healthcare professionals experience 51.2% social stigma. T-test results show that there is no difference in scale total score and sub-dimensions according to gender and marital status, while ANOVA Test results show that there is no difference in the same variables according to age and educational status (p> 0.05). In comparisons made between occupational groups, it was observed that technician and technician groups showed negative differences compared to nurses (p <0.05). As a result of qualitative evaluations, it has been observed that healthcare professionals mostly avoid people from themselves and the injustices in their salary payment processes as negative situations. Conclusion- It is important to work on raising social awareness about the reasons and negative consequences of social stigmatization. It is thought that studies should be conducted to improve the sense of self in healthcare professionals in order to decrease the perception of social stigmatization, which has a very negative impact in the long term. Reducing negative emotions and thoughts in healthcare professionals, who are the main actors in maintaining the quality of service during the provision of health services, is an important issue that should not be ignored outside the epidemic process.