Views
13
Downloands
2
Sosyal bilimlerdeki sorulardan biri teori ve pratik arasındaki ilişkidir. Bu soru dünyaları polis ve oikos olarak ikiye ayrılmış antik Yunan filozoflarına kadar uzanır. Sadece polisin aktörleri vita activa anlamında aktif eylemi gerektiren demokratik toplumun oluşumuna katılıyorlardı. Arendt’e göre polis’in çöküşü ve orta çağla yeni bir toplum biçiminin ortaya çıkışıyla birlikte vita activa başlangıçta vita contemplativa’nın karşısına konmuş ve daha sonra vita contemplativa lehine değersizleştirilmiştir. Ancak Galilei ve Kant’la teoriyi dünyadan soyutlamak olarak değil sosyal gerçeklikleri şekillendirmek olarak anlayan bir karşı hareket de ortaya çıkmıştır. Bugün teori ve pratik araştırma kavramıyla birleştirilmiştir. Aşağıda teori-pratik ilişkisinin tarihsel gelişim sürecindeki oluşumu verildikten sonra, kimi kurumların özellikleri teori ve pratikle olan iletişimine bakılarak yeniden tanımlanmaktadır. .
One of the questions in social sciences is the relationship between theory and practice. This question extends to the ancient Greek philosophers who divided the worlds into two as police and oikos. Only police actors were involved in the formation of a democratic society that requires active action in the sense of vita activa. According to Arendt, with the collapse of the police and the emergence of a new form of society in the Middle Ages, vita activa was initially opposed to vita contemplativa and later disvalidized to the benefit of vita contemplativa. But with Galilei and Kant there was also an opposition movement that understood the theory not as the abstraction of the world, but as the shaping of social realities. Today it is combined with the theory and practical research concept. After the formation of the theoretical-practical relationship is given in the historical development process below, the characteristics of some institutions are redefined in view of the communication with the theory and practice. The .
One of the questions in social science is about the relationship between theory and practice. It goes back to the ancient Greek philosophers whose world was strictly separated into polis and oikos. The actors of polis were engaged in the formation of a democratic society requiring active action in the sense of vita activa. According to Arendt, with the decline of the polis and the emergence of the new forms of the society, vita activa was initially set in opposition to vita contemplativa and then later devalued in favour of vita contemplativa. However, with Galilei and Kant, there has been a counter-movement, which no longer understood theory as isolating oneself from the world but as shaping social realities. Theory and practice are joined today by the concept of research. The relationship between theory and practice will be examined initially within a historical perspective offering the genesis. Then the features of some institutions are discussed in terms of their communications with theory and practice and redefined accordingly.
Field : Sosyal, Beşeri ve İdari Bilimler
Journal Type : Uluslararası
Article Detail 
Similar Articles
Download PDF
Journal Information
Listen Paper
Cite
Print This Page
Share
Mendeley
