User Guide
Why can I only view 3 results?
You can also view all results when you are connected from the network of member institutions only. For non-member institutions, we are opening a 1-month free trial version if institution officials apply.
So many results that aren't mine?
References in many bibliographies are sometimes referred to as "Surname, I", so the citations of academics whose Surname and initials are the same may occasionally interfere. This problem is often the case with citation indexes all over the world.
How can I see only citations to my article?
After searching the name of your article, you can see the references to the article you selected as soon as you click on the details section.
 Views 16
 Downloands 3
DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY OF CONTRAST ENHANCED COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY IN DIAGNOSING RENAL CELL CARCINOMA, TAKING HISTOPATHOLOGY AS GOLD STANDARD
2019
Journal:  
Pakistan Armed Forces Medical Journal
Author:  
Abstract:

Objective: To determine the diagnostic accuracy of contrast enhanced computed tomography (CECT) scan in detecting renal cell carcinoma taking histopathology as gold standard. Study Design: Validity Study. Place and Duration of Study: Study was conducted in Department of Radiology, Pakistan Institute of Medical Sciences, and Islamabad, from Aug 2017 to Mar 2018. Material and Methods: The study was done on 60 patients with renal masses on ultrasonography. Pregnant females and patients not willing for surgery were excluded. All the subjects underwent pre-contrast and contrastenhanced CT scanning of the abdomen using a multi-sectional spiral CT device. All CT scan findings were interpreted by one consultant radiologist for presence or absence of renal cell carcinoma. CT scan findings were correlated with histopathological findings. Data was analyzed with SPSS v 20. Results: Mean age at the time of presentation was 56.79 ± 9.25 years. Out of these 60 patients, 41 (68.33%) were males and 19 (31.67%) were females with male to female ratio of 2.2:1. In CT scan positive patients, 34 were true positive and 2 were false positive. Among CT scan negative patients, 4 were false negative (FN) where as 20 were true negative (TN) (p=0.0001). Overall sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV) and diagnostic accuracy of contrast enhanced computed tomography (CT) in detecting renal cell carcinoma patients was 89.47%, 90.91%, 94.44%, 83.33% and 90.0% respectively. Conclusion: This study concluded that CECT scan is a highly sensitive and accurate non-invasive modality for detecting renal cell carcinoma.

Keywords:

Citation Owners
Information: There is no ciation to this publication.
Similar Articles












Pakistan Armed Forces Medical Journal

Field :   Sağlık Bilimleri

Journal Type :   Uluslararası

Metrics
Article : 2.236
Cite : 131
Pakistan Armed Forces Medical Journal