User Guide
Why can I only view 3 results?
You can also view all results when you are connected from the network of member institutions only. For non-member institutions, we are opening a 1-month free trial version if institution officials apply.
So many results that aren't mine?
References in many bibliographies are sometimes referred to as "Surname, I", so the citations of academics whose Surname and initials are the same may occasionally interfere. This problem is often the case with citation indexes all over the world.
How can I see only citations to my article?
After searching the name of your article, you can see the references to the article you selected as soon as you click on the details section.
 Views 21
 Downloands 4
Discrimination of Malignant and Benign Breast Masses Using Computer-Aided Diagnosis from Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced Magnetic Resonance Imaging
2021
Journal:  
Haseki Tıp Bülteni
Author:  
Abstract:

Aim: To reduce operator dependency and achieve greater accuracy, the computer-aided diagnosis (CAD) systems are becoming a useful tool for detecting noninvasively and determining tissue characterization in medical images. We aimed to suggest a CAD system in discriminating between benign and malignant breast masses. Methods: The dataset was composed of 105 randomly breast magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) including biopsy-proven breast lesions (53 malignant, 52 benign). The expectation-maximization (EM) algorithm was used for image segmentation. 2D-discrete wavelet transform was applied to each region of interests (ROIs). After that, intensity-based statistical and texture matrix-based features were extracted from each of the 105 ROIs. Random Forest algorithm was used for feature selection. The final set of features, by random selection base, splatted into two sets as 80% training set (84 MRI) and 20% test set (21 MRI). Three classification algorithms are such that decision tree (DT, C4.5), naive bayes (NB), and linear discriminant analysis (LDA) were used. The accuracy rates of algorithms were compared. Results: C4.5 algorithm classified 20 patients correctly with a success rate of 95.24%. Only one patient was misclassified. The NB classified 19 patients correctly with a success rate of 90.48%. The LDA Algorithm classified 18 patients correctly with a success rate of 85.71%. Conclusion: The CAD equipped with the EM segmentation and C4.5 DT classification was successfully distinguished as benign and malignant breast tumor on MRI.

Keywords:

2021
Author:  
0
2021
Author:  
Citation Owners
Information: There is no ciation to this publication.
Similar Articles








Haseki Tıp Bülteni

Field :   Sağlık Bilimleri

Journal Type :   Uluslararası

Metrics
Article : 847
Cite : 376
Haseki Tıp Bülteni