User Guide
Why can I only view 3 results?
You can also view all results when you are connected from the network of member institutions only. For non-member institutions, we are opening a 1-month free trial version if institution officials apply.
So many results that aren't mine?
References in many bibliographies are sometimes referred to as "Surname, I", so the citations of academics whose Surname and initials are the same may occasionally interfere. This problem is often the case with citation indexes all over the world.
How can I see only citations to my article?
After searching the name of your article, you can see the references to the article you selected as soon as you click on the details section.
  Citation Number 1
 Views 16
 Downloands 1
Comparing the Global Warming Impact from Wind, Solar Energy and Other Electricity Generating Systems through Life Cycle Assessment Methods (A Survey)
2022
Journal:  
International Journal of Renewable Energy Research
Author:  
Abstract:

This study compares Greenhouse Gases (GHGs) emissions as CO2 equivalent per one kilowatt-hour of two types of renewable power generation technologies (solar and wind) compared to other traditional power generation technologies through life cycle assessment methods. In addition, the study investigated the factors affecting (GHGs) emissions from different power generation technologies.Various methods are used to generate electricity, each with merits and disadvantages regarding the installation and operating cost, GHGs impact, and other considerations. Related to Global Warming Potential (GWP), the produced quantities of GHGs of each generation method vary through manufacturing, construction, utilization, and decommissioning stages with or without recycling. For wind and solar power, the release of GHGs reached between 70 and 98% during manufacturing (including raw materials) and decommissioning. The recycling stage may play a crucial role in decreasing the impact of GHGs up to 40%. Most GHGs released from traditional power plants (e.g., coal fired, oil, and gas) are from fuel combustion during the operation period. Adopting emissions calculated by the Life Cycle Approach (LCA) with electrical generation from solar and wind ways allows a fair comparison per (CO2) eq/ KWh basis and factors affecting each LCA stage. For the two studied systems, wind power emits the least amount of (CO2) eq/ KWh, with average values of 13.91 and 12.7 g CO2eq/kWh for offshore and onshore farms, respectively. While photovoltaic has the highest contribution to GHGs emissions, with a mean value of 23.39 g for CdTe, it is followed by 33.14, 39.93, 43.84,49.33, 50.76 for a-Si, m-Si, CIGs, CIS and sc-Si g (CO2) eq/ KWh, respectively. Concentrated Solar Power (CSP) occupied the medium contribution of 35.6 g for the tower and 30.94 g (CO2) eq/ KWh for the trough. Compared to fossil fuel-fired systems, the average (CO2) eq/ KWh is 936 g for coal-fired, 730 g for oil, and 502 for gas-fired power systems. Replacing one kilowatt-hour of coal or oil-generated electricity with one kilowatt-hour of wind power can save up to 923 or 716 g (CO2) eq/ kWh.<

Keywords:

2022
Author:  
Citation Owners
Attention!
To view citations of publications, you must access Sobiad from a Member University Network. You can contact the Library and Documentation Department for our institution to become a member of Sobiad.
Off-Campus Access
If you are affiliated with a Sobiad Subscriber organization, you can use Login Panel for external access. You can easily sign up and log in with your corporate e-mail address.
Similar Articles












International Journal of Renewable Energy Research

Field :   Eğitim Bilimleri; Fen Bilimleri ve Matematik; Sağlık Bilimleri; Sosyal, Beşeri ve İdari Bilimler

Journal Type :   Uluslararası

Metrics
Article : 1.313
Cite : 742
2023 Impact : 0.099
International Journal of Renewable Energy Research