Özet:

Governance of the state in the era of Fordism post-Fordist transition to the structure of the state in the era of the state, in conjunction with local, national, regional and global levels at the disappearance of the distinction of being the decisive actor, along with new actors to be involved in the policy making process would make it possible for the political and bureaucratic decision-making refers to the process of a changer. Public policy, on the other hand, according to a very widely accepted approach, is what the government chooses to do and what it chooses not to do, and these are the reasons for the elections. The governance process has led to the re-establishment of public policy making. In the new decision-making process, non-governmental organizations and the private sector have created governance actors at all levels to create a tripartite governance and decision-making structure with the state. Governance has legitimized the participation of a greater number of actors in public policy making in the decisions taken by the state and in the public policy making process than in the fordist era by making it legally and politically possible. Understanding the impact of governance on public policy making will also facilitate understanding public policy making. The main purpose of this study; To facilitate understanding the effects of governance understanding and practices on public policy making in the transition from fordism to post-fordism.