Özet:

Title: Innovative Education Paradigm: Teaching Technologies Emotional Area Movement Summary: In education, with innovative paradigms getting more and more important, teaching technologies continue to be placed in education. The use of teaching technologies in education ensures that students participate actively in learning, that learning is permanent and that the quality of education is improved. The purpose of this article is to reveal the benefits of teaching technologies in the movement of the sensual area in which individual characteristics such as feelings, values and attitudes are in the forefront during the teaching of students. Mobile technologies, simulations, computer models, EDpuzzle, Instagram, Kahoot!, teaching technologies and up-to-date programs used during teaching increase students’ attention, interest, motivation and satisfaction. In this context, nursing educators should adopt/support the use of teaching technologies by following the innovative education that the age brings and develop themselves with continuous professional development activities.  Keywords: sensory field; nursing education; teaching technologies; paradigm Supporting institutions: Source: 1.        Alpay E, Gulati S. Student-led podcasting for engineering education. European Journal of Engineering Education 2010; 35(4): 415-427. 2nd        Armstrong G, Tucker J, Massad V. Interviewing the experts: Student produced podcast. Journal of Information Technology Education: Innovations in Practice 2009; 8: 79-90. and 3.        Bahramnezhad F, Shiri M, Asgari P & et al. A review of the Nursing paradigm. Open Journal of Nursing 2015; 5(1): 17. The fourth.        The Basavanthappa BT. Nursing Education, 2nd ed. New Delhi: Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers; 2009. and 5.        Bastable SB and Doody JA. The behavioral objectives. In: Bastable SB, Editor. Nurse as Educator Principles of Teaching and Learning for Nursing Practice. 3 rd ed. Massachusetts: Jones and Bartlett Publishers, 2008. 383 to 427. 6 .        Ceylan B. Information and Communication Technologies and Teacher. In: Young SZ, Editor. Changing values and new educational paradigms. 1 . and pressure. Ankara: Pegem Academy; 2017. of 107–125. The 7. Choi Y, Song E, Oh E. Effects of teaching communication skills using a video clip on a smart phone on communication competence and emotional intelligence in nursing students. Archives of Psychiatric Nursing 2015; 29(2): 90-95. and 8.        Christiansen A. Storytelling and professional learning: A phenomenographic study of students' experience of patient digital stories in nurse education. Nurse Education Today 2011; 31(3): 289-293. The 9.        Day L, Ziehm SR, Jessup MA & et al. The power of nursing: An innovative course in values clarification and self-discovery. Journal of Professional Nursing 2017; 33(4): 267-270. The 10.     Day-Black C and Merrill EB. Using mobile devices in nursing education. The ABNF Jornal Fall 2015; 26(4): 8-84. 11 of 11.     and Demirel. Planning and Evaluation in Teaching. 6 . and pressure.  Ankara: Pegem A Publishing; 2003. 12 is.     Demirel O. Programme Development of the Theory to Apply. 24 is. and pressure. Anonymous: Pegem A Publishing; 2015. 13 .     Fruit M, Bird G, Happy S and Ark. Design of animation-supported video modules for MOOCs: example of homeostasis. AUAd 2018; 4(4): 15-42. 14 .     The young S. Information Society and Education.  In: Young SZ, Editor. Changing values and new educational paradigms. The 1st. Ankara: Pegem Academy; 2017. 2 to 22. 15 .     The structure of scientific revolutions and scientific wars in the light of the concept of the Sun B. Paradigma: Thomas S. Kuhn and Alan D. Sokal from the physicists on the Front. The Turkish Journal of Education Sciences 2003; 1(1): 23-44. 16 is.     Cable Z. Target determination: Cognitive, Emotional and Devinational Fields. In: Sugar H, Editor. Programme Development Concepts and Approaches. Three of the Basque. Anonymous: Announcement of the Year, 2014. of 127-161. 17 .     Short B, Kaya H. The attitudes of nursing teachers towards technology. The Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology - TOJET 2006; 5(2): 77-83. 18 .     Lee H, Min H, Oh SM & et al. Mobile technology in undergraduate nursing education: a systematic review. Healthcare Informatics Research 2018; 24(2): 97-108. 19th.     Karaveli Çakır S. Opinions and experiences of nursing students about the use of technological equipment. The University of Ege School of Nursing Magazine 2017; 33(3): 11-20. 20 is.     Kangas-Niemi A, Manninen K, Mattsson J. Facilitating affective elements in learning-in a palliative care context. Nurse Education in Practice 2018; 33: 148-153. 21 of 21.     Lee NJ, Chae SM, Kim H & et take. Mobile-based video learning outcomes in clinical nursing skill education: a randomized controlled trial. Computers, Informatics, Nursing 2016; 34(1): 8-16. 22 is.     Lee SS and Kwon MK. Effects of self-directed fundamental nursing practice using smartphone videos on self-efficacy, practice satisfaction, and skill competency. J Korean Acad Soc Nurs Educ 2016; 22(3): 255-263. 23 is.     Licorish SA, Owen HE, Daniel B & et al. Students' perception of Kahoot!influence on teaching and learning. Research and Practice in Technology Enhanced Learning 2018; 13(1): 9.  24 is.     by Mischel J. Watch and learn? Using EDpuzzle to enhance the use of online videos. The Management Teaching Review 2018. 2379298118773418. 25 . by Oermann MH. [Editor of the Thinking about teaching in nursing.  Nurse Educator 2016; 41(5): 217-218. The 26.     and speciality. Education programs and teaching. The fourth. and pressure. Ankara: The Ossym Publications; 2018. The 27.     The importance of the paradigms in Nursing. Journal of Education and Research in Nursing 2014; 11(2): 3-5. 28 is.     Price DM, Strodtman L, Brough E & et al. Digital storytelling an innovative technological approach to nursing education. Nurse Educator 2015; 40(2): 66-70. The 29.     Renjith V, G R, George A. Trends in Nursing Education. Indian Journal of Applied Research 2015; 5(8): 496-498. The 30.     The M. Digital Storytelling Tool. In: The first N, the editor. Technology applications in education enriched with examples of events. The 1st. Ankara: Pegem Academy; 2018. of 15-42. 31 is.     Scheckel M. Selecting learning experiences to curriculum outcomes. In: Billings DM, Halstead JA, Editors. Teaching in nursing a guide for faculty. St. Louis, Missouri: ELSEVIER, 2012 170 to 187. by 32.     Seren LP, How do we provide sustainability in mind in the nearest C. Medical education? Journal of Child Health and Diseases 2015; 58(3): 123-130. 33 is.     Shellenbarger T, Robb M. Technology-based strategies for promoting clinical reasoning skills in nursing education. Nurse Educator 2015; 40(2): 79-82. 34 is.     Shepherd CK, McCunnis M, Brown L & et al. Research the use of simulation as a teaching strategy. Nursing Standard 2010; 24(35): 42-48. 35 is.     Sönmez V. The Teacher's Handbook in Program Development. The 9. and pressure. Ankara: Memory Publishing; 2001. 36 is.     A, a, a, a, a, a, a, a, a, a, a, a, a, a and a. A technological step in nursing education: IMventro-sim. by G.O.P by E.A.H. JAREN 2016; 2(2): 103-108. 37 is.     by Taylor LD. The affective domain in nursing education: Educators' perspectives. and (2014). Theses and Dissertations. 484. https://dc.uwm.edu/etd/484 38.     by Van Hoozer. The teaching role of the professional nurse.  In: Van Hoozer HL, Bratton BD, Ostmoe PM & et al. The teaching process theory and practice in nursing. USA Norwalk, Connecticut: Appleton-Century-Crofts, 1987. 22 to 23. 39 is.     Ward TD. Do you hear what I hear? The impact of a hearing voices simulation on affective domain attributes in nursing students. Nursing Education Perspectives 2015; 36(5): 329-331. 40 .     Zadar, Zadar and Ganzer. Cinematic technology – the role of visual learning. Nurse Educator 2011; 36(2): 76-79.

Anahtar Kelimeler: