User Guide
Why can I only view 3 results?
You can also view all results when you are connected from the network of member institutions only. For non-member institutions, we are opening a 1-month free trial version if institution officials apply.
So many results that aren't mine?
References in many bibliographies are sometimes referred to as "Surname, I", so the citations of academics whose Surname and initials are the same may occasionally interfere. This problem is often the case with citation indexes all over the world.
How can I see only citations to my article?
After searching the name of your article, you can see the references to the article you selected as soon as you click on the details section.
  Citation Number 1
 Views 23
 Downloands 1
Comparison of AR parametric methods with subspace-based methods for EMG signal classification using stand-alone and merged neural network models
2016
Journal:  
Turkish Journal of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science
Author:  
Abstract:

This research introduces an electromyogram (EMG) pattern classification of individual motor unit action potentials (MUPs) from intramuscular electromyographic signals. The presented technique automatically classifies EMG patterns into healthy, myopathic, or neurogenic categories. To extract a feature vector from the EMG signal, we use different autoregressive (AR) parametric methods and subspace-based methods. The proposal was validated using EMG recordings composed of 1200 EMG patterns obtained from 7 healthy, 7 myopathic, and 13 neurogenic-disordered people. A feedforward error backpropagation artificial neural network (FEBANN) and combined neural network (CNN) were used for classification, where the success rate was slightly higher in CNN. Among the different AR and subspace methods used in this study, the highest performance was obtained with the eigenvector method. The following rates were the results achieved by using the CNN. The correct classification rate for EMG patterns was 97% for healthy, 93% for myopathic, and 92% for neurogenic patterns. The obtained accuracy for EMG signal classification is approximately 94% for CNN. The rates for FEBANN were as follows: 97% for healthy patterns, 92% for myopathic patterns, and 91% for neurogenic patterns. The obtained accuracy was 93.3%. By directly using raw EMG signals, EMG classifications of healthy, myopathic, or neurogenic classes are automatically addressed.

Keywords:

Citation Owners
Attention!
To view citations of publications, you must access Sobiad from a Member University Network. You can contact the Library and Documentation Department for our institution to become a member of Sobiad.
Off-Campus Access
If you are affiliated with a Sobiad Subscriber organization, you can use Login Panel for external access. You can easily sign up and log in with your corporate e-mail address.
Similar Articles






Turkish Journal of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science

Field :   Mühendislik

Journal Type :   Uluslararası

Metrics
Article : 2.879
Cite : 1.406
2023 Impact : 0.016
Turkish Journal of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science