User Guide
Why can I only view 3 results?
You can also view all results when you are connected from the network of member institutions only. For non-member institutions, we are opening a 1-month free trial version if institution officials apply.
So many results that aren't mine?
References in many bibliographies are sometimes referred to as "Surname, I", so the citations of academics whose Surname and initials are the same may occasionally interfere. This problem is often the case with citation indexes all over the world.
How can I see only citations to my article?
After searching the name of your article, you can see the references to the article you selected as soon as you click on the details section.
 Views 6
The Effect of Median Lobe Presence on Oncologic and Functional Outcomes in Robot Assisted Radical Prostatectomy in the Learning Curve
2020
Journal:  
The New Journal of Urology
Author:  
Abstract:

Objective: We aimed to investigate the effect of the presence of median lobe (ML) in the learning curve on perioperative, oncologic and functional outcomes. Material and Methods: We analyzed 38 consecutive patients undergoing RALP in our clinic between July 2017 and October 2019.Patients were operated by the same surgical team on the first learning curve. They were analyzed in two groups according to the presence or absence of a ML determined during RARP. Perioperative, oncologic and functional results were compared between the groups. Results: Prostatic ML was detected in 10 (26.3%) of the patients included in the study.Prostate specific antigen (PSA), body mass index (BMI), length of hospital stay, perioperative and postoperative complication rates were similar in both groups (p <0.01). Surgical margin positivity rate was 20% (2/10) in the ML group and 10.7% (3/28) in the ML group.Numerical differences between the groups were not statistically significant (p <0.01). Nevertheless, prostate volume (p = 0.008) and estimated blood loss (TCC) (p = 0.001) were significant in favor of patients with median lobes. Although the mean cantilever time was slightly higher in patients with ML, these numerical differences were not statistically significant (p <0.01). Bladder neck reconstruction rates were 100% (100%) in the ML group and 14% (4/28) in the ML-free group (p = 0.001). Continence rates between patients with and without ML were at 4 weeks (20% to 35%) after catheter removal, at 12 weeks (70% to 64.2%) and at 24 weeks (90% to 89.2%). ) and no statistically significant difference was observed at all times. Conclusion: Learning curve, we think that RALP can be applied safely and effectively in challenging cases in centers without high surgical experience. When we compared the oncologic, functional and complication rates of patients without ML in our initial series, we obtained results consistent with the literature.

Keywords:

The Effect of Median Lobe Presence on Oncologic and Functional Outcomes in Robot Assisted Radical Prostatectomy in the Learning Curve
2020
Author:  
Abstract:

Objective: We aimed to investigate the effect of the presence of median lobe (ML) in the learning curve on perioperative, oncological and functional outcomes. Material and Methods: We analyzed 38 consecutive patients undergoing RALP in our clinic between July 2017 and October 2019.Patients were operated by the same surgery team on the first learning curve. They were analyzed in two groups according to the presence or absence of a ML determined during RARP. Perioperative, oncological and functional results were compared between the groups. Results: Prostatic ML was detected in 10 (26.3%) of the patients included in the study.Prostate specific antigen (PSA), body mass index (BMI), length of hospital stay, perioperative and postoperative complication rates were similar in both groups (p <0.01). Surgical margin positivity rate was 20% (2/10) in the ML group and 10.7% (3/28) in the ML group.Numerical differences between the groups were not statistically significant (p <0.01). Nevertheless, prostate volume (p = 0.008) and estimated blood loss (TCC) (p = 0.001) were significant in favor of patients with median lobes. Although the average cantilever time was slightly higher in patients with ML, these numerical differences were not statistically significant (p <0.01). Bladder neck reconstruction rates were 100% (100%) in the ML group and 14% (4/28) in the ML-free group (p = 0.001). Continence rates between patients with and without ML were at 4 weeks (20% to 35%) after catheter removal, at 12 weeks (70% to 64.2%) and at 24 weeks (90% to 89.2%). No statistically significant difference was observed at all times. Conclusion: Learning curve, we think that RALP can be applied safely and effectively in challenging cases in centers without high surgical experience. When we compared the oncological, functional and complication rates of patients without ML in our initial series, we obtained results consistent with the literature.

Keywords:

Citation Owners
Information: There is no ciation to this publication.
Similar Articles










The New Journal of Urology

Journal Type :   Uluslararası

Metrics
Article : 518
Cite : 74
The New Journal of Urology