1951 Cenevre Sözleşmesi, ülkesinde haklı nedenlere dayanan zulüm görme iddiasında olan kişilere, devletinin kendisini korumaya istekli olmadığı veya korumaya muktedir olamadığı durumlarda mülteci statüsü verileceğine ilişkin tanımı yaparken aynı zamanda en ağır suçları işleyen kişilerin bu statünün dışında kalmasına ilişkin de hükümler düzenlemiştir. Bu, gerek suçluların cezasız bırakılmamaları gerekse iltica ülkesinde kamu güvenliğinin korunması açısından anlaşılabilir bir durumdur. Bununla birlikte, sığınma talebinde bulunan çocuk askerler için kritik olan şey, mülteci tanımına uyan koşulları taşısalar bile korumaya erişemeyecekleri ve özellikle de Mülteci Sözleşmesinin ‘ağır suçların varlığı nedeniyle’ korumayı reddettiği gerçeğidir. Bu çalışmada 1951 Cenevre Sözleşmesi 1(F) hükmünde sayılan uluslararası koruma dışında bırakma koşulları analiz edilecek ve aynı zamanda bu madde hükmü ile ayrı bir düzenlemeye tabii olmayan çocuk askerlerin durumu Mülteci hukuku bağlamında değerlendirilecektir.
The 1951 Geneva Convention defines the status of a refugee to persons who claim to be persecuted on the basis of legitimate grounds in their country, while the status of a refugee shall be granted in cases where the State is not willing to protect or is unable to protect them, and the status of persons who committed severe crimes shall be excluded from this status. This is a clear situation for the protection of public security in the refuge country if the criminals should not be sent without punishment. However, what is critical for children’s soldiers who are seeking asylum is the fact that they will not be able to access protection even if they carry the conditions that suit the refugee definition, and especially the fact that the Refugee Convention refuses to protect it “for the presence of severe crimes”. This study will analyze the conditions of departure from international protection as set out in Article 1(F) of the 1951 Geneva Convention and will also assess the situation of children's soldiers not subject to a separate arrangement with the provisions of this Article in the context of the Refugee Law.
The 1951 Convention Relating to the Status of Refugees provides provisions for the well-founded fear of persecution of refugees in their countries to grant refugee status in cases where the state is unwilling or unable to protect him/her, while also stipulating that those who commit the most serious offenses are excluded. This is understandable both in terms of not being left unpunished and for the protection of public security in the country of asylum. However, what is critical to child soldiers applying for asylum is the fact that even if they meet conditions that are provided in the definition of refugees, they will not be able to access protection, and in particular the Refugee Convention refuses to protect it ‘due to the existence of grave breaches’. Furthermore, although there are provisions in Article 1 (F) of the Convention on the conditions of exclusion from international protection, there is no detailed regulation as to which conditions meet this, and the interpretation and application of these provisions raises certain problems. In this study, the conditions of exclusion from international protection referred to in Article 1 (F) of the Geneva Convention of 1951 will be analyzed and at the same time the situation of child soldiers who are not subject to a separate regulation under this article will be evaluated in the context of refugee law.
Alan : Hukuk
Dergi Türü : Ulusal
Benzer Makaleler | Yazar | # |
---|
Makale | Yazar | # |
---|