Views
49
Downloands
12
Bu çalışmada ‘Demokrat Parti(DP)’nin dikkate almak zorunda kaldığı karşıt kesimler arasında ortaya koyduğu din politikası’ ele alınmaktadır. DP’nin ‘din politikası’ üzerinde çeşitli çalışmalar yapılmıştır. Fakat bu çalışmalarda konu daha çok ‘Kemalist bir bakış açısıyla DP’yi çek etme’ yaklaşımıyla ele alınmıştır. Bu çalışmada DP iktidarı öncesi ve sonrası din politikası ele alınmıştır. DP Kemalist inkılaplardan bir kısmını sürdürmüş bir kısmından ise vazgeçmiştir. Çalışmanın amacı DP’nin vazgeçtiği bazı devrimlerden dolayı toplum, siyaset, medya ve bürokraside yer alan çeşitli kesimlerin tepki ve tutumlarını ortaya koymaktır. DP’nin din politikasında Kemalistlerin ‘irtica’ söylemi ile İslami kesimin ‘maneviyata önem vermeme’ söylemi arasında dikotomik bir denge politikası izlediği görülmüştür. DP’nin din politikasında iki uçlu reaktif bir söylemi dillendirdiği söylenebilir. Kemalist kesimler DP’yi ‘karşı devrimcilikle’ suçlarken İslami kesimler ise DP’yi din politikası konusunda ‘Halk Partisi’nin devamı’ olmakla suçlamaktaydı. Çalışmada konu ile ilgili yapılan araştırmalara ek olarak medyaya yansıyan tartışmalar ve meclis tutanakları incelenmiştir.
This study discusses the "religious policy" which the Democratic Party (DP) has to consider among the opposite sections. A number of studies have been conducted on the 'religious policy' of the DP. But in these studies, the issue was more addressed by the approach to "tracking the DP from a chemalist point of view". This study discussed the religious policy before and after the power of the DP. And some of them have been removed from a part of the covenant. The aim of the study is to show the reactions and attitudes of the various sections of society, politics, media and bureaucracy due to some of the revolutions that the DP has abandoned. In the religious policy of the DP, it has been seen that a dicotomic balance policy is followed between the Kemalists' saying "irtica" and the Islamic section's saying "not pay attention to the mentality". It can be said that the DP has spoken a two-sided reactive speech in religious politics. The Kemalist sections accused the DP of 'anti-revolutionary' while the Islamic sections accused the DP of being 'the continuation of the People's Party' on religious policy. In addition to the research on the subject, discussions and council attitudes reflected in the media were studied.
In this study, the religious policy of DP is discussed. DP was in power in Turkey in the 50s years. In this process, DP followed a religious policy that balance the two opposing groups. Various studies have been carried out on the "religious policy" of the DP. However, in these studies, the subject was mostly handled with the approach of “questioning the Democrat Party from a Kemalist perspective”. In this study, the policy of religion before and after the DP government was discussed. DP continued some of the 'Kemalist reforms' related to religion and gave up some of them. Various reactions have occurred in society, politics and bureaucracy due to the abandoned Kemalist reforms. The aim of the study is to demonstrate the DP's attitude towards these emerging reactions. DP encountered the reaction of two opposing groups. Due to the religion policy, the "secular" section accused the DP of "reactionism". The Islamic group accused DP of "not giving importance to spirituality". DP followed a 'dichotomic' balance policy against these two sections. It can be said that the DP advocates a 'two-pronged reactive approach' in religious policy. Therefore, Kemalist groups accused the DP of "counter-revolutionism". Islamic groups accused the DP of being a 'continuation of the People's Party' on religious policy. In the study, researches on the subject were examined. In addition, the discussions reflected in the media of the period were used. Very important data were also obtained from the parliamentary minutes of the period.
Field : Eğitim Bilimleri; Sosyal, Beşeri ve İdari Bilimler
Journal Type : Ulusal
Article Detail 
Similar Articles
Download PDF
Journal Information
Listen Paper
Cite
Print This Page
Share
Mendeley
