User Guide
Why can I only view 3 results?
You can also view all results when you are connected from the network of member institutions only. For non-member institutions, we are opening a 1-month free trial version if institution officials apply.
So many results that aren't mine?
References in many bibliographies are sometimes referred to as "Surname, I", so the citations of academics whose Surname and initials are the same may occasionally interfere. This problem is often the case with citation indexes all over the world.
How can I see only citations to my article?
After searching the name of your article, you can see the references to the article you selected as soon as you click on the details section.
  Citation Number 2
 Views 40
 Downloands 10
Eğitim Politikası Bağlamında İşbirlikli ve Geleneksel Öğrenme Yöntemlerinin Tutuma Etkisinin Meta Analizi
2019
Journal:  
Kuramsal Eğitimbilim Dergisi
Author:  
Abstract:

Bu çalışmanın amacı, eğitim politikası bağlamında ortaokul fen bilimleri ve matematik derslerinde uygulanan işbirlikli öğrenme yöntemlerinin geleneksel öğrenmeye karşılık, öğrencilerin derse karşı tutumları üzerindeki etkisini meta analitik biçimde araştırmak suretiyle, eğitim politikası belirleyicilerine, öğretmen eğitim ve yetiştirilmesinde rol oynayan eğitimcilere bilgi sunmaktır. Dâhil etme ölçütlerine uygun 33 çalışmadan 33 etki büyüklüğü hesaplanmıştır. Bu etki büyüklükleri toplam 3033 öğrencinin katıldığı uygulamalardan elde edilen verilerle hesaplanmıştır. Bulgular açık biçimde geleneksel öğrenmeye kıyasla işbirlikli öğrenmenin tutum üzerinde olumlu yönde daha etkili olduğunu göstermiştir. İşbirlikli öğrenmenin tutum üzerindeki genel etki büyüklüğü g = 0.445 olup, bu etki orta düzeye yakın fakat küçük düzey sınıfındadır. Bu sonuç geleneksel öğrenme yöntemlerine göre işbirlikli öğrenmenin, öğrencinin derse karşı tutumunu olumlu yönde 0.445 standart sapma kadar yükselttiği anlamına gelmektedir. Bu sonucun eğitim politikası bağlamında anlamı, işbirlikli öğrenme yöntemlerinin tutum üzerinde olumlu yönde etkili olduğu fakat bu etkinin öğretim yöntem ve tekniklerini belirlemede izlenen politikalara muhtemel etkisinin küçük düzeyde olduğu biçimindedir.

Keywords:

Eğitim Politikası Bağlamında İşbirlikli ve Geleneksel Öğrenme Yöntemlerinin Tutuma Etkisinin Meta Analizi
2019
Author:  
Abstract:

The objective of this study is to provide information to educational policy determiners, educators who play a role in teachers' education and training, by metanalysis of the influence of collaborative learning methods applied in high school sciences and mathematics courses in the context of education, in response to traditional learning, and by metanalysis of the influence of students' attitudes to class. The impact size of 33 studies according to the inclusion criteria was calculated. These impact sizes are calculated by data obtained from the applications in which a total of 3033 students participated. The findings clearly showed that collaborative learning is more positive on attitude than traditional learning. The size of the overall impact on attitude of collaborative learning is g = 0. It is 445 and this effect is close to the middle but small level class. This result means that collaborative learning according to traditional learning methods raises the student’s attitude to class in a positive direction to the 0.445 standard deviation. In the context of the educational policy, this result means that collaborative learning methods have a positive impact on attitude, but the potential impact of this effect on the policies followed in determining the methods and techniques of teaching is at a small level.

A Meta-analysis Of The Effect Of Cooperative and Traditional Learning On Attitude In Connection With Educational Policy
2019
Author:  
Abstract:

The main purpose of this study was to investigate and interpret the effectiveness of cooperative learning techniques in science and mathematics with comparision to the traditional learning on students’ attitude towards the course at middle school level meta-analytically in connection with educational policy so as to bring new results for policy makers and teacher training administrators. 33 effect sizes were revealed from 33 primary studies that are selected to be included in the meta-analysis based on the inclusion criteria. The effect sizes calculated by using the data gathered from the cooperative learning classes totally include 3033 students. Hedges g values used as the benchmark of effect size measurement in this study. The results clearly show that, cooperative learning is more effective on attitude when compared to traditional learning. The results indicate an overall small mean effect size of g = 0.445 for the effectiveness of cooperative learning on students’ attitude towards the course. This means that cooperative learning compared to the traditional learning, has increased the attitude of the students in positive manner by amount of 0.445 standard deviation. In the aspect of educational policy of teaching methods, cooperative learning is positively effective on attitude, but its probable effect on educational policy making is small. 

Keywords:

Citation Owners
Attention!
To view citations of publications, you must access Sobiad from a Member University Network. You can contact the Library and Documentation Department for our institution to become a member of Sobiad.
Off-Campus Access
If you are affiliated with a Sobiad Subscriber organization, you can use Login Panel for external access. You can easily sign up and log in with your corporate e-mail address.
Similar Articles








Kuramsal Eğitimbilim Dergisi

Field :   Eğitim Bilimleri

Journal Type :   Uluslararası

Metrics
Article : 588
Cite : 5.676
Kuramsal Eğitimbilim Dergisi