User Guide
Why can I only view 3 results?
You can also view all results when you are connected from the network of member institutions only. For non-member institutions, we are opening a 1-month free trial version if institution officials apply.
So many results that aren't mine?
References in many bibliographies are sometimes referred to as "Surname, I", so the citations of academics whose Surname and initials are the same may occasionally interfere. This problem is often the case with citation indexes all over the world.
How can I see only citations to my article?
After searching the name of your article, you can see the references to the article you selected as soon as you click on the details section.
  Citation Number 9
 Views 121
 Downloands 26
Karadeniz’de deniz alanı sınırlandırması davası (Romanya/Ukrayna) ve uluslararası hukuk açısından etkileri
2014
Journal:  
Ankara Üniversitesi Hukuk Fakültesi Dergisi
Author:  
Abstract:

The ongoing issue of delimitation of continental shelf and exclusive economic zone, firstly between Romania and Union of Soviet Socialist Republics (USSR), and between Romania and Ukraine after 1991, was brought before the International Court of Justice (ICJ) by Romania on 16thSeptember 2004. The ICJ, having considered the geographical features of the region and having disregarded the discussions on the legal characteristics of Serpents’ Island, did take no account of the presence of the Island in question while designating appropriate reference points for the determination of the equal-distance line in the maritime delimitation; in other words, it did not bestow continental shelf and exclusive economic zone on the Island. This stance adopted by the ICJ is of vital importance within the context of the Aegean Sea territorial waters/continental shelf dispute between Turkey and Greece, and of the Eastern Mediterranean Sea delimitation of continental shelf and exclusive economic zone dispute between Greece, Greek Cypriot Administration of Southern Cyprus and Turkey. Further, in the case of maritime delimitation in the Black Sea, the verdict of delimitation may reach up to a certain extent so long as the third state parties’ interests are not affected, the lack of determination of an absolute terminus ad quem, is of particular concern to Turkey and Bulgaria as the disputes over exclusive economic zone and continental shelf boundaries between these States have not been settled. Forthwith execution of the accentuated delimitation process shall provide a certain determination of the boundaries, of which the terminus ad quem was not established by the verdict, and shall prevent the probable disputes amongst the regional nations

Keywords:

The case of maritime limitation in the Black Sea (Romania/Ukraine) and its effects in terms of international law
2014
Author:  
Abstract:

The ongoing issue of delimitation of continental shelf and exclusive economic zone, firstly between Romania and the Union of Soviet Socialist Republics (USSR), and between Romania and Ukraine after 1991, was brought before the International Court of Justice (ICJ) by Romania on 16thSeptember 2004. The ICJ, having considered the geographical features of the region and having disregarded the discussions on the legal characteristics of Serpents' Island, did no account of the presence of the island in question while designating appropriate reference points for the determination of the equal-distance line in the maritime delimitation; in other words, it did not bestow continental shelf and exclusive economic zone on the island. This position adopted by the ICJ is of vital importance within the context of the Aegean Sea territorial waters/continental shelf dispute between Turkey and Greece, and of the Eastern Mediterranean Sea delimitation of continental shelf and exclusive economic zone dispute between Greece, Greek Cypriot Administration of Southern Cyprus and Turkey. Furthermore, in the case of maritime delimitation in the Black Sea, the verdict of delimitation may reach up to a certain extent as long as the interests of the third state parties are not affected, the lack of determination of an absolute terminus ad quem, is of particular concern to Turkey and Bulgaria as the disputes over exclusive economic zone and continental shelf boundaries between these States have not been solved. With the execution of the accentuated delimitation process shall provide a certain determination of the boundaries, of which the terminus ad quem was not established by the verdict, and shall prevent the probable disputes among the regional nations.

Keywords:

Citation Owners
Attention!
To view citations of publications, you must access Sobiad from a Member University Network. You can contact the Library and Documentation Department for our institution to become a member of Sobiad.
Off-Campus Access
If you are affiliated with a Sobiad Subscriber organization, you can use Login Panel for external access. You can easily sign up and log in with your corporate e-mail address.
Similar Articles






Ankara Üniversitesi Hukuk Fakültesi Dergisi

Field :   Hukuk

Journal Type :   Ulusal

Metrics
Article : 860
Cite : 5.474
2023 Impact : 0.137
Ankara Üniversitesi Hukuk Fakültesi Dergisi