User Guide
Why can I only view 3 results?
You can also view all results when you are connected from the network of member institutions only. For non-member institutions, we are opening a 1-month free trial version if institution officials apply.
So many results that aren't mine?
References in many bibliographies are sometimes referred to as "Surname, I", so the citations of academics whose Surname and initials are the same may occasionally interfere. This problem is often the case with citation indexes all over the world.
How can I see only citations to my article?
After searching the name of your article, you can see the references to the article you selected as soon as you click on the details section.
 Views 23
 Downloands 2
DJ stent and nephrostomy drainage outcomes for upper urinary tract obstruction and determinative factors for drainage selection
2021
Journal:  
Annals of Medical Research
Author:  
Abstract:

Aim: To compare drainage outcomes from double J stent and percutaneous nephrostomy stent for upper urinary tract obstruction and to research factors determining the stent method to be used. Upper urinary tract obstruction may be caused by ureter and kidney stones internally or by local advanced-stage pelvic organ cancers externally and this may lead to sepsis or obstructive uropathy. It is necessary to drain the kidney immediately before definitive treatment of stone patients and prevent increased morbidity and mortality in cancer patients. Materials and Methods: A total of 213 patients with upper urinary tract obstruction and drainage using double J stent and percutaneous nephrostomy catheter were retrospectively assessed. Demographic, operative-postoperative data and predictive factors for stent selection were assessed.Results: The groups were different in terms of age and gender demographically, as well as disease duration before the procedure, comorbid diseases, causative factors, hydronephrosis degree and stone size (p 0.05). The groups were different in terms of operational data, operation time, auxiliary time, complications and definitive treatment for stones (p 0.05). Independent predictive factors for stent selection were stone size (Odds ratio:1.3), obstructive duration before the procedure (Odds ratio:1.1), causative factors (Odds ratio:38.1), and hydronephrosis degree (Odds ratio:10.5). Conclusion: For patients with long duration of obstruction and high degree of hydronephrosis, with obstruction caused by local advanced pelvic cancer and large ureter stones and with sepsis, percutaneous nephrostomy drainage should be chosen instead of double J stent drainage. Downloads Download data is not yet available. Article Details How to Cite Guler, Y. (2021). DJ stent and nephrostomy drainage outcomes for upper urinary tract obstruction and determinative factors for drainage selection . Annals of Medical Research, 28(2), 0329–0335. Retrieved from https://annalsmedres.org/index.php/aomr/article/view/386 More Citation Formats ACM ACS APA ABNT Chicago Harvard IEEE MLA Turabian Vancouver Download Citation Endnote/Zotero/Mendeley (RIS) BibTeX Issue Volume 28 Issue 2 (2021): February Section Original Articles CC Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0

Keywords:

2021
Author:  
Citation Owners
Information: There is no ciation to this publication.
Similar Articles












Annals of Medical Research

Field :   Sağlık Bilimleri

Journal Type :   Uluslararası

Metrics
Article : 3.232
Cite : 295
2023 Impact : 0.008
Annals of Medical Research