User Guide
Why can I only view 3 results?
You can also view all results when you are connected from the network of member institutions only. For non-member institutions, we are opening a 1-month free trial version if institution officials apply.
So many results that aren't mine?
References in many bibliographies are sometimes referred to as "Surname, I", so the citations of academics whose Surname and initials are the same may occasionally interfere. This problem is often the case with citation indexes all over the world.
How can I see only citations to my article?
After searching the name of your article, you can see the references to the article you selected as soon as you click on the details section.
 Views 41
 Downloands 9
Efficacy of Computed Tomography and Ultrasonography in Diagnosis of Metastatic Cervical Lymph Nodes in Orofacial Cancer
2021
Journal:  
Iranian Journal of Otorhinolaryngology
Author:  
Abstract:

Introduction: There is no consensus on which imaging modality is better for the detection of metastatic cervical lymph nodes in orofacial malignancies. This study evaluates the efficacy of computed tomography (CT) and ultrasonography (US) in diagnosis of metastatic lymph nodes in orofacial cancer.   Materials and Methods: Sixty patients with various histologically diagnosed orofacial malignant lesions and clinical evidence of cervical lymph node metastasis were examined using US and CT. Further, the affected lymph nodes were biopsied and examined histologically. The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV), and accuracy of the techniques were calculated. The data was analyzed using Statistical Package for Social Sciences (SPSS) version 19 (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA) and Microsoft Excel 2010 (Microsoft, Redmond, WA, USA). Test of statistical significance was set at 0.05.   Results: US recorded a sensitivity, specificity, PPV, NPV, and accuracy of 80.0%, 57.1%, 77.5%, 60.0%, and 71.7%, respectively (p = 0.004), while CT recorded a sensitivity, specificity, PPV, NPV, and accuracy of 87.1%, 71.4%, 85.0%, 75.0%, and 81.7%, respectively (p <0.0001). Lymph node size was the commonest criterion in the diagnoses of metastases in cases with cervical lymph nodes.   Conclusion: Although we obtained great results using US, our results indicated CT to be a better imaging modality for detecting metastatic cervical lymph nodes in orofacial malignancies.

Keywords:

2021
Author:  
Citation Owners
Information: There is no ciation to this publication.
Similar Articles










Iranian Journal of Otorhinolaryngology

Field :   Sağlık Bilimleri

Journal Type :   Uluslararası

Metrics
Article : 638
Cite : 91
2023 Impact : 0.008
Iranian Journal of Otorhinolaryngology