Görüntüleme
2
İndirme
3
Bu çalışmanın amacı sosyal bilgiler öğretmenlerinin argümantasyon temelli sosyal bilgiler öğretimine ilişkin inanç ve deneyimlerinin ne olduğunu incelemektir. Çalışma 2021-2022 Eğitim öğretim yılı bahar döneminde Güneydoğu Anadolu Bölgesi içerisinde bulunan bir ilde Milli Eğitim Bakanlığı’na bağlı olarak görev yapan öğretmenler ile gerçekleştirilmiştir. Araştırmanın çalışma grubunu 8 kadın ve 13 erkek öğretmen olmak üzere toplamda 21 sosyal bilgiler öğretmeni oluşturmaktadır. Araştırmada; nitel olgu bilim deseni kullanılarak araştırma sorusuna cevap aranmıştır. Araştırmada veri toplama aracı olarak yarı yapılandırılmış ve sesli düşünmeli görüşmeden yararlanılmıştır. Araştırmada öğretmenlerin kendi sosyal bilgiler öğrenme deneyimleri, sosyal bilimlerin doğası ile argümantasyon arasında nasıl bir ilişki kurdukları ve argümantasyon temelli sosyal bilgiler öğretimine yönelik görüşleriyle, görüşlerini etkileyen faktörlerin neler olduğuna odaklanılmıştır. Araştırmanın bulgularına dayalı olarak durumlar arasındaki benzerlik ve farklılıklardan yola çıkılarak, soru-cevapla dersi zenginleştirmek için argümantasyon, küçük sosyal bilimciler gibi düşünmeyi öğretmek için argümantasyon, çocukların kendi sorularını sormalarını desteklemek için argümantasyon, etkin vatandaşlık becerilerin geliştirmek için argümantasyon ve sosyal becerileri geliştirmek için argümantasyon olmak üzere 5 tipleme oluşturulmuştur. Araştırma sonucunda, öğretmenlerin argümantasyon temelli sosyal bilgiler öğretimine ilişkin inanç ve görüşlerinin kendi öğrenme deneyimlerinden, okulun ve sınıfın fiziksel koşullarından, idare ve veli tutumundan, öğrenci seviyesinden, ilgi duydukları alan ve konulardan, uyguladıkları öğretim yöntemlerinin etkililiğine dair düşünce ve deneyimlerinden etkilendiği görülmüştür. Bu sonuçlar ışığında çeşitli öneriler sunulmuştur.
The aim of this study is to explore what the beliefs and experiences of social information teachers are about the teaching of social information based on argumentation. The study was conducted in 2021-2022 with teachers who are responsible for the Ministry of National Education of a province located within the southeastern Anatolian region during the spring year of the educational year. The study group consists of 21 social information teachers, including 8 women and 13 male teachers. In the research, the quality facts were asked to answer the research question using the scientific design. The research has been used as a semi-configured and voice-thinking conversation as a data collection tool. The study focused on teachers’ experience of learning their own social information, how they establish a relationship between the nature of social sciences and the argumentation, and what are the factors that influence their views, with their views on the teaching of social information based on the argumentation. Based on the findings of the research, it was created 5 types of arguments, including arguments to enrich the lesson with question-response, arguments to teach thinking like small social scientists, arguments to support children to ask their own questions, arguments to develop effective citizenship skills, and arguments to develop social skills. The study found that teachers' beliefs and views on the teaching of social information based on argumentation were influenced by their own learning experiences, the physical conditions of the school and classroom, the management and guardian attitude, the student level, the areas and subjects they are interested in, and their thoughts and experiences on the effectiveness of the teaching methods they apply. In light of these results, various recommendations have been presented.
The aim of this study is to examine the beliefs and experiences of social studies teachers about argumentation-based social studies teaching. The study was conducted in the spring semester of the 2021-2022 academic year with teachers working under the Ministry of National Education in a developed province located in the Southeastern Anatolia region. The study group of the research consists of 21 social studies teachers in total, including 8 female and 13 male teachers. In the research, the answer to the research question was sought by using qualitative case science design. Semi-structured and voice-guided interview were used as a data collection tool in the research. In the research, teachers' own social studies learning experiences, how they establish a relationship between the nature of social sciences and argumentation, and their views on argumentation-based social studies teaching, decisively focused on what factors affect their views. Based on the findings of the research and considering the similarities and differences between the situations, 5 different types were created as follows: argumentation to enrich the lesson with question and answer, argumentation to teach how to think like little social scientists, argumentation to support children to ask their own questions, argumentation for the development of effective citizenship skills and argumentation to improve social skills. As a result of the research, it was seen that teachers' beliefs and views on argumentation-based social studies teaching were affected by their own learning experiences, by their beliefs and opinions on the teaching of social studies, by the physical conditions of the classroom and the school administration and the parent stance, by the level of the student, and by the subjects in areas of interest, thoughts and experiences applied from the effectiveness of the teaching methods. Consequently, various recommendations have been presented within the framework of these results.
Alan : Eğitim Bilimleri
Dergi Türü : Ulusal
Makale Detay 
Benzer Makaleler
PDF Görüntüle
Dergi Bilgisi
Eseri Dinleyin
Alıntı Yap
Bu Sayfayı Yazdırın
Paylaş
Mendeley
