Görüntüleme
17
Çalışmamızda, öncelikle TTK m. 421.6’nın uygulanmasını gerektiren genel kurul kararları ve bu kararların kapsamı ele alınacaktır. Bu bağlamda, pay devri sınırlaması getiren, mevcut imtiyazların kapsamını değiştiren, mevcut imtiyazları kaldıran kararlar ile tasfiyeden dönme kararının hükmün uygulama alanına dahil olup olmadığı ve işletme konusunun tamamen değiştirilmesi ifadesi ile hangi durumlarının kastedildiği hususları inceleme konusu yapılacaktır. Daha sonra, nama yazılı pay sahiplerinin TTK m. 421.6’de öngörülen imkândan faydalanabilmeleri için ilgili karara olumlu oy vermemelerinin yeterli olup olmayacağı ve karara olumsuz oy veren pay sahiplerinin ayrıca muhalefetlerini toplantı tutanağına geçirtmiş olmaları şartının aranıp aranmayacağı sorunları mercek altına alınacaktır. Nihayet, TTK m. 421.6’deki kararlara olumsuz oy vermiş nama yazılı pay sahipleri bakımından altı aylık süre boyunca kanuni bağlamın etkisiz hâle gelip gelmeyeceği, şirketin alım teklifinde bulunarak pay devrine onay vermeyi reddedebilmesinin mümkün olup olmadığı, bu hususta nama yazılı payların borsaya kote edilmiş olup olmasının farklı bir sonuca varılmasını gerektirip gerektirmeyeceği meseleleri ele alınacaktır.
In our work, we will first discuss the General Assembly decisions that require the implementation of TTK m. 421.6 and the scope of these decisions. In this context, it will be examined whether the decisions that bring the limitation of share transfer, change the scope of existing benefits, remove the existing benefits and the decision to return from clearance are included in the scope of the ruling and the expression of the full change of the business subject and what circumstances are intended. The question will be subsequently discussed whether the shareholders in the name written will not be sufficient to vote in favour of the relevant decision in order to take advantage of the possibility provided for in TTK m. 421.6 and whether the shareholders who vote in favour of the decision will also be sought for the condition that they have put their opposition to the meeting. Finally, it will be addressed the issues that the legal context will be invalid for the six-month period in terms of the name-written shareholders who have voted against the decisions in TTK m. 421.6, whether it is possible for the company to refuse to approve the share turnover by making a purchase offer, whether the name-written shareholders are quoted on the stock exchange, and whether it is necessary for a different conclusion to be reached.
In this study, temporary ineffectiveness of share transfer restrictions in the context of Turkish Commercial Code (TCC) Art. 421.6 in joint stock company will be examined. In our study, primarily general assembly resolutions requiring the implementation of TCC Art. 421.6 and the scope of these resolu-tions will be discussed. In this context, it will be examined whether the decisi-ons that change the scope of existing privileges, remove existing privileges and the decision to withdraw from liquidation fall within the scope of application of the provision. In addition, it will be clarified which situations are meant by the expression of complete change of the company’s field of activity. Then, the questions will be discussed whether it will be sufficient for the regis-tered share owners not to agree to the relevant resolution in order to benefit from the opportunity envisaged in TCC art. 421.6. Again, the question of whether the shareholders who voted against the resolution should also have their opposition recorded in the meeting minutes will be examined. Finally, it will be evaluated whether the statutory restriction will become inef-fective for the six-month period for the registered share owners who voted against the resolutions in TCC Art. 421.6. In addition, the issue will be discus-sed whether it is possible for the company to refuse to give consent for the transfer of shares by making a take over offer in cases where 421.6 is applicab-le. In this regard, it will be evaluated whether shall be reached a different conclusion or not when the registered shares are listed on the stock exchange.
Alan : Hukuk
Dergi Türü : Ulusal
Makale Detay 
Benzer Makaleler
PDF Görüntüle
Dergi Bilgisi
Eseri Dinleyin
Alıntı Yap
Bu Sayfayı Yazdırın
Paylaş
Mendeley
