User Guide
Why can I only view 3 results?
You can also view all results when you are connected from the network of member institutions only. For non-member institutions, we are opening a 1-month free trial version if institution officials apply.
So many results that aren't mine?
References in many bibliographies are sometimes referred to as "Surname, I", so the citations of academics whose Surname and initials are the same may occasionally interfere. This problem is often the case with citation indexes all over the world.
How can I see only citations to my article?
After searching the name of your article, you can see the references to the article you selected as soon as you click on the details section.
 Views 15
 Downloands 4
Comparison of Treatment Modalities in Adult Idiopathic Sudden Hearing Loss: A 5-year Outcome from a Tertiary Referral Center
2022
Journal:  
Haseki Tıp Bülteni
Author:  
Abstract:

Aim: Although there are many treatment options for the treatment sudden idiopathic sensorineural hearing loss (SSHL), the most effective treatment method is still unclear. The purpose of this study was to determine the optimal treatment option for SSHL by examining the 5-years patient data of our clinic. Methods: The patients who were diagnosed as SSHL in our clinic between January 1, 2016 and July 31, 2021 were included in the present study. The treatment in groups were only oral steroid (OS) (group 1, n=30), OS and hyperbaric oxygen therapy (HBOT) (group 2, n=30), OS and intratympanic steroid therapy (ITS) (group 3, n=30) and OS+ITS+HBOT (group 4, n=30). The baseline pure tone audiometry (PTA), 3rd month PTA averages, audiological hearing gains and treatment success (a gain more than 15 Db in PTA) were determined and compared statistically. Results: The initial PTA averages (dB) in groups were 46.07±14.20, 45±12.49, 45.83±10.92, and 45.93±10.29, respectively. There were significant differences between the groups according to the PTA after treatment (p<0.05). In the after-treatment PTA threshold evaluation, the mean of group 4 was statistically significantly lowest (p<0.05). There were significant differences between the groups according to the PTA gain (p<0.05). In the paired comparisons of the groups according to PTA gain, the value of group 4 was significantly highest in all groups (p<0.05). No significant difference was found between the groups according to the other parameters (p>0.05). Conclusion: In this study, the combined (oral+IT+HBOT) therapy was superior to other treatment modalities.

Keywords:

2022
Author:  
0
2022
Author:  
Citation Owners
Information: There is no ciation to this publication.
Similar Articles












Haseki Tıp Bülteni

Field :   Sağlık Bilimleri

Journal Type :   Uluslararası

Metrics
Article : 847
Cite : 377
2023 Impact : 0.019
Haseki Tıp Bülteni