User Guide
Why can I only view 3 results?
You can also view all results when you are connected from the network of member institutions only. For non-member institutions, we are opening a 1-month free trial version if institution officials apply.
So many results that aren't mine?
References in many bibliographies are sometimes referred to as "Surname, I", so the citations of academics whose Surname and initials are the same may occasionally interfere. This problem is often the case with citation indexes all over the world.
How can I see only citations to my article?
After searching the name of your article, you can see the references to the article you selected as soon as you click on the details section.
 ASOS INDEKS
  Citation Number 4
 Views 10
1990’ların Yeni Bağımsız Türk Sineması’nda Emekçi Öznenin Kayboluşu: Küreselleşme ve Festivalizm
2021
Journal:  
Kültür ve İletişim
Author:  
Abstract:

This essay aims at analyzing the disappearance of the working class subject and the politics of redistribution in the new independent Turkish cinema emerged in the mid 1990s. In those years a new cinema, very different from Yeşilçam filmmaking practices, was born. A new generation of filmmakers who were cosmopolitan, spoke several languages and knew about the world cinema became visible. They were also very individualistic although the economic problems and the agonies of the working class were still very persistent. The political pressure caused by the 1980 Coup d’Etat was much lighter towards the 1990s. Although the labour unions were active in the 1990s and the political restrictions were much lighter than the previous decades the new intellectual filmmakers such as Derviş Zaim, Nuri Bilge Ceylan, Yeşim Ustaoğlu and Zeki Demirkubuz refrained from focusing on the agonies of the working class. They instead preferred to concentrate on micro political issues, identity problems and existential stories. This essay argues that apart from the individualism propagated by the prime minister of the post-Coup d’Etat period Turgut Özal’s neoliberal policies, globalisation and its cultural extensions such as festivalism are crucial structural agents in shaping the filmmakers’ cinematographic choices. Festivals that target the well-educated but less radical urban elites are rarely critically analysed by the academia and the new dependencies they create are not throughoutly discussed. However, they highly restrict the thematic choices of the young filmmakers as this essay aims at arguing.

Keywords:

Citation Owners
Attention!
To view citations of publications, you must access Sobiad from a Member University Network. You can contact the Library and Documentation Department for our institution to become a member of Sobiad.
Off-Campus Access
If you are affiliated with a Sobiad Subscriber organization, you can use Login Panel for external access. You can easily sign up and log in with your corporate e-mail address.
Kültür ve İletişim

Journal Type :   other

Kültür ve İletişim