User Guide
Why can I only view 3 results?
You can also view all results when you are connected from the network of member institutions only. For non-member institutions, we are opening a 1-month free trial version if institution officials apply.
So many results that aren't mine?
References in many bibliographies are sometimes referred to as "Surname, I", so the citations of academics whose Surname and initials are the same may occasionally interfere. This problem is often the case with citation indexes all over the world.
How can I see only citations to my article?
After searching the name of your article, you can see the references to the article you selected as soon as you click on the details section.
  Citation Number 7
 Views 73
 Downloands 17
Antrenör Öz Yeterlik Ölçeği: Geçerlik ve Güvenirlik Çalışması
2020
Journal:  
Gazi Beden Eğitimi ve Spor Bilimleri Dergisi
Author:  
Abstract:

Antrenör öz yeterliği, antrenörlerin sporcularının öğrenme ve performansını hangi ölçüde etkileyebileceklerine ilişkin, mesleki yetenek ve kapasitelerine yönelik inancı olarak açıklanabilir. Antrenör verimliliği üzerinde etkisi olan psikolojik yapılardan olan antrenör öz yeterliğinin doğru yöntemlerle ölçülebilmesi gerekir. Bu araştırmada, antrenörlerin öz yeterlik inançlarını ölçebilecek psikometrik özelliklerde bir ölçek geliştirilmesi amaçlanmıştır. Araştırmaya Türkiye’de çeşitli spor dallarında faal olarak antrenörlük yapan 320 antrenör (32,43± 8.06 yaş) katılmıştır. Ölçeğin geçerlik ve güvenirlik analizinde madde toplam puan ilişkisi, örneklem uygunluk katsayısı, açımlayıcı ve doğrulayıcı faktör analizleri ile Croanbah’s Alfa Güvenirlik Katsayısı kullanılmıştır. Elde edilen bulgulara göre ölçek, toplam varyansın %61,487’sini açıklayan 21 madde, 5 faktörlü bir yapı olarak ortaya çıkmıştır. Ölçeğin birinci düzey DFA uyum indeksi değerleri madde-faktör yapısını doğrulamıştır. Ölçeğin bütününün Croanbah’s Alfa Güvenirlik Katsayısı değeri .86’dır. Sonuç olarak, Antrenör Öz Yeterlik Ölçeği’nin (AÖYÖ) geçerli ve güvenilir bir ölçme aracı olduğu ve antrenörlerin öz yeterlik düzeylerini belirlemek için kullanılabileceği söylenebilir.

Keywords:

Trainer Self Qualification Scale: Validity and Trust Study
2020
Author:  
Abstract:

The coach’s self-quality can be explained as a belief in the professional skills and capabilities of the coach in the extent to which they can influence the athlete’s learning and performance. The coach’s self-capacity of the psychological structures that have an impact on the trainer’s efficiency should be measured by the right methods. This study aims to develop a scale in psychometric characteristics that can measure coach's self-capacity beliefs. The study included 320 coaches (32.43±8.06 years old) who are active in various sports in Turkey. In the validity and reliability analysis of the measurement, the substance's total score ratio, the sample conformity ratio, the discovery and verifying factor analysis and Croanbah's Alfa reliability ratio were used. According to the findings obtained, the scale appeared as a structure of 5 factors in 21 items, which describes 61,487 percent of the total variance. The first-level DFA conformity index values of the measurement confirmed the substance-factor structure. The Croanbah’s Alfa Safety Count of the whole measurement is .86. As a result, it can be said that the Coach Self Qualification Measurement is a valid and reliable measurement tool and that the Coach can be used to determine the level of Self Qualification.

Keywords:

A Coaching Self Efficacy Scale: Validity and Reliability Study
2020
Author:  
Abstract:

Coaching self-efficacy is explained as the belief of coaches about their professional abilities and capacities to how extent they can affect the learning and performance of their athletes. Coaching self-efficacy which is thought to have an impact on coach efficiency, should be measured with correct methods. The purpose of this study; to develop a measurement tool with psychometric properties that can measure coaching self-efficacy beliefs. The participants of the research consisted of 320 coaches (age 32,43± 8.06) who working actively. The item-total score relation, sample suitability coefficient, exploratory confirmatory factor analysis and Croanbah’s Alfa Reliability Coefficient were used in the validity and reliability analysis of the scale. According to the findings, the scale has emerged as a 5-dimensional structure with 21 items that explaining 61.487% of the total variance. First level CFA fit index values of the scale confirmed the item-factor structure. Croanbah’s Alpha Reliability Coefficient value of the whole scale is .86. As a result, it can be said that the Coach Self-Efficacy Scale (CSES) is a valid and reliable measurement tool and can be used to determine the self-efficacy levels of the coaches.

Keywords:

Citation Owners
Attention!
To view citations of publications, you must access Sobiad from a Member University Network. You can contact the Library and Documentation Department for our institution to become a member of Sobiad.
Off-Campus Access
If you are affiliated with a Sobiad Subscriber organization, you can use Login Panel for external access. You can easily sign up and log in with your corporate e-mail address.
Similar Articles








Gazi Beden Eğitimi ve Spor Bilimleri Dergisi

Field :   Spor Bilimleri

Journal Type :   Ulusal

Metrics
Article : 541
Cite : 3.369
2023 Impact : 0.333
Gazi Beden Eğitimi ve Spor Bilimleri Dergisi