User Guide
Why can I only view 3 results?
You can also view all results when you are connected from the network of member institutions only. For non-member institutions, we are opening a 1-month free trial version if institution officials apply.
So many results that aren't mine?
References in many bibliographies are sometimes referred to as "Surname, I", so the citations of academics whose Surname and initials are the same may occasionally interfere. This problem is often the case with citation indexes all over the world.
How can I see only citations to my article?
After searching the name of your article, you can see the references to the article you selected as soon as you click on the details section.
 Views 8
 Downloands 2
Apparent Diffusion Coefficient Values as a Complementary Tool in Prostate Gland Disease: Retrospective Evaluation of Apparent Diffusion Coefficient Values with Pathological Data Guided by PI-RADSv2.1
2023
Journal:  
Bulletin of Urooncology
Author:  
Abstract:

Objective: This retrospective study reveals whether a lesion is a benign pathological process or malignant by measuring apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) values following prostate imaging reporting and diagnostic system version 2.1 (PI-RADSv2.1) guide on multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (MpMRI) examinations. Furthermore, this study aims to determine the cut-off ADC values (ADCv) that may exist to help identify and distinguish between benign and the malignant lesions. Additionally, the paper evaluates whether there is a correlation between malignant lesions’ International Society of Urological Pathology (ISUP) score and ADCv, and whether ADCv provide information about prostate cancer (PCa) aggressiveness without requiring invasive procedures. Materials and Methods: The study group consised of 243 patients. The lesions were diagnosed using transrectal ultrasound-guided cognitive MRI fusion. MpMRI images before the biopsy were evaluated according to PI-RADSv2.1 guideline by a radiologist. Three groups, benign prostatic tissue, prostatitis, and PCa were obtained according to the histopathological results. Results: When the cut-off value for ADC was 780x10-3, sensitivity was 80%. When the cut-off value was taken as 668x10-3, the sensitivity and specificity were 72% and 62%, respectively. When the cut-off ADCv was taken as 647x10-3, the sensitivity was 83% and the specificity was 48.5%. ADCv varied significantly depending on the ISUP groups (p=0.003). It was determined that the ISUP 1 group was significantly higher compared to other groups. ADC group mean values were not significantly different between groups 2, 3, 4, and 5. Conclusion: ADCv may be a suitable tool for estimating PCa aggressiveness, and it shows a significant potential to improve the diagnostic accuracy.

Keywords:

Citation Owners
Information: There is no ciation to this publication.
Similar Articles










Bulletin of Urooncology

Field :   Sağlık Bilimleri

Journal Type :   Uluslararası

Metrics
Article : 112
Cite : 2
2023 Impact : 0.012
Bulletin of Urooncology