Citation Number
2
Views
44
Downloands
6
Vahdetu’l-kaside meselesi, ilk dönemlerde bazı edebiyat eleştirmenleri tarafından ele alınsa da özel bir başlık altında modern dönemde tartışılmaya başlanan bir konu olmuştur. Modern dönem eleştirmenleri, kadîm dönem kasidelerinde konu ve şekil açısından birlik, bütünlük ve uyumun söz konusu olup olmadığı üzerinde durmuş ve bunun hakkında görüşler ortaya koymuşlardır. Nitekim bu görüşlerini uygulamalı olarak ilk dönem kasidelerinde göstermeye çalışan eleştirmenler de olmuştur. Öyle ki bazıları kadîm dönem kasidelerinde, kafiye ve vezinden başka herhangi bir uyum ve birliğin olmadığını savunurken bazıları da bu kasidelerin her açıdan bir bütün olduğunu savunmuştur. Eleştirmenlerin farklı görüş bildirmelerinin sebebi ise vahdetu’l-kaside anlayışını tam olarak nasıl anladıklarına bağlı bir durum olarak ortaya çıkmıştır. Kasideleri, kimi şekil açısından incelerken kimi de konu açısından ele almıştır. Bu makalede ise öncelikli olarak Batı eleştirmenlerine göre bu mesele incelenmiş daha sonra ise klasik ve modern dönemde yaşayan Arap eleştirmenlerine göre kasidelerdeki konu birliği meselesi ele alınmış ve ortaya koydukları bu fikirlere bakılarak kadîm dönemdeki kasidelerde ahenk ve uyum açısından el-vahdetu’l-ʿudviyyenin olduğu fakat vahdetu’l-mevdûʿiyyenin olmadığı sonucuna varılmıştır.
The issue of Vahdetu'l-kaside, though discussed by some literary critics in the early periods, was a topic that began to be discussed in the modern era under a special title. The critics of the modern era have standed on whether the subject and shape of unity, integrity and harmony are concerned in their ancient periods and have expressed opinions about it. In fact, there were also critics who tried to demonstrate their views practically in the first period. So some of them claimed that there was no harmony and unity in their ancient periods, but that there was no harmony and unity in their ancient periods, while some also claimed that these cases were a whole in every way. The reason for the critics' different opinions appeared as a situation that depends on how they exactly understand the vedetu'l-kaside understanding. Some of them are in the shape, and some of them are in the shape of the shape. In this article the question was first studied according to the Western critics and then the Arab critics who lived in the classical and modern period, the issue of unity in the casides was discussed and the ideas they presented in the casides in the ancient period were concluded that in terms of harmony and harmony the question was al-vahdetu'l-ʿudviyyen but that the question was not al-vahdetu'l-mevdûyen.
Although the issue of unity in the poem was handled by some literary critics in the early periods, it was a topic that started to be discussed under a special topic in the modern period. Modern period critics have emphasized whether there is unity, integrity and harmony in the ancient epochs by subject and shape, and reported information about it. As a matter of fact, there have been critics who tried to demonstrate these views practically in the first period vaults. In fact, some argued that there was no harmony and unity other than rhyme and meter in the ancient kasides, while others argued that these odees were in all respects as a whole. The reason why the critics gave different opinions depends on how they understood the understanding of unity in the poem. While examining the kasides in terms of shape, some of them dealt with in terms of subject. In this article, firstly, this issue was examined according to Western critics, and then, according to Arab critics living in the classical and modern period, the issue of unity in the poem was handled and a result was tried to be reached by looking at these ideas they put forward.
Field : İlahiyat
Journal Type : Uluslararası
Article Detail 
Citation Owners
Similar Articles
Download PDF
Journal Information
Listen Paper
Print This Page
Share
Mendeley
