Özet:

There were different approaches between the classical period and the contemporary period on the question of whether the subject is valid in the Qur’an. As a result, in the classical period there is almost a alliance in the Qur’an about the subject being vaki, while in the modern period it has been focused on the fact that this is a problem and as a result, the view that the subject is not vaki in the Qur’an has begun to be spoken. The question is how the same process evolved in the Shi’i-Imami tradition, and how any change in the concept of the subject has occurred or not. This is why in our work we have been taught the tradition of the Shi’i-Imami interpretation of the subject of the matter and the historical balance of the subject. According to this, the Shi’i-Imami tradition was chronologically divided into four periods, and in the first three periods two and in the last three periods the approach to the subject of three different inspectors was discussed. In this way, it has been examined whether a change in the perception of the object has occurred or not, when it comes to the contemporary period, as a problem. As a result, in the tradition of Shi’i-Imami interpretation, the subject was seen as a problem, as in the Sunni tradition, but in no way was considered as a matter that should be completely rejected.

Anahtar Kelimeler: