Kullanım Kılavuzu
Neden sadece 3 sonuç görüntüleyebiliyorum?
Sadece üye olan kurumların ağından bağlandığınız da tüm sonuçları görüntüleyebilirsiniz. Üye olmayan kurumlar için kurum yetkililerinin başvurması durumunda 1 aylık ücretsiz deneme sürümü açmaktayız.
Benim olmayan çok sonuç geliyor?
Birçok kaynakça da atıflar "Soyad, İ" olarak gösterildiği için özellikle Soyad ve isminin baş harfi aynı olan akademisyenlerin atıfları zaman zaman karışabilmektedir. Bu sorun tüm dünyadaki atıf dizinlerinin sıkça karşılaştığı bir sorundur.
Sadece ilgili makaleme yapılan atıfları nasıl görebilirim?
Makalenizin ismini arattıktan sonra detaylar kısmına bastığınız anda seçtiğiniz makaleye yapılan atıfları görebilirsiniz.
 Görüntüleme 12
 İndirme 2
Metabolik cerrahide ekstraksiyon metodlarının kıyaslanması: endo bag faydalı mı?
2018
Dergi:  
Cukurova Medical Journal
Yazar:  
Özet:

Purpose: Morbid obesity has become a global problem nowadays and different surgical methods are being applied to overcome it. In our study, we aimed to compare endo-bag and wound protection methods of tissue removal methods after laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG) for morbid obesity. Materials and Methods: We have retrospectively reviewed 120 records of 80 male and 40 female patients who underwent laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy due to morbid obesity in our clinic between January 2015 and November 2016. Demographic findings, duration of surgery, complications, wound infection rates and duration of length of stay in hospital were evaluated.  Results: The mean duration of bariatric surgery was 72.1 ± 21.4 minutes (range 34-97 min). The mean duration of operation was 68.2 ± 6.4 in the endobag operation and 77.1 ± 5.8 min in the wound protection method. Mean postoperative hospital stay was 5.76 ± 1.17 days (5.2±1.3, 6.3±0.8). The difference between the wound infection rates of both groups was statistically significant.  Conclusion: In our study, it was found that removal of the gastric field from the intrabdominal region by endo bag method in bariatric surgery is more effective due to leading less infection and complication rates than wound protection ring method.

Anahtar Kelimeler:

Comparison of methods of extraction in metabolic surgery: is endo bag useful?
2018
Yazar:  
Özet:

Purpose: Morbid obesity has become a global problem nowadays and different surgical methods are being applied to overcome it. In our study, we aimed to compare endo-bag and wound protection methods of tissue removal methods after laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG) for morbid obesity. Materials and Methods: We have retrospectively reviewed 120 records of 80 male and 40 female patients who underwent laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy due to morbid obesity in our clinic between January 2015 and November 2016. Demographic findings, duration of surgery, complications, wound infection rates and duration of length of stay in hospital were evaluated.  Results: The average duration of bariatric surgery was 72.1 ± 21.4 minutes (range 34-97 min). The average duration of operation was 68.2 ± 6. 4 in the endobag operation and 77.1 ± 5.8 min in the wound protection method. Mean postoperative hospital stay was 5.76 ± 1.17 days (5.2±1.3, 6.3±0.8). The difference between the wound infection rates of both groups was statistically significant.  Conclusion: In our study, it was found that removal of the gastric field from the intrabdominal region by endo bag method in bariatric surgery is more effective due to leading less infection and complication rates than wound protection ring method.

Anahtar Kelimeler:

Atıf Yapanlar
Bilgi: Bu yayına herhangi bir atıf yapılmamıştır.
Benzer Makaleler












Cukurova Medical Journal

Alan :   Sağlık Bilimleri

Dergi Türü :   Uluslararası

Metrikler
Makale : 2.296
Atıf : 1.852
2023 Impact/Etki : 0.075
Cukurova Medical Journal