User Guide
Why can I only view 3 results?
You can also view all results when you are connected from the network of member institutions only. For non-member institutions, we are opening a 1-month free trial version if institution officials apply.
So many results that aren't mine?
References in many bibliographies are sometimes referred to as "Surname, I", so the citations of academics whose Surname and initials are the same may occasionally interfere. This problem is often the case with citation indexes all over the world.
How can I see only citations to my article?
After searching the name of your article, you can see the references to the article you selected as soon as you click on the details section.
 Views 6
 Downloands 1
B.1.1.7 SARS CoV-2 Varyantına Bağlı COVID-19 Tanısıyla Takip Edilen Hastaların Değerlendirilmesi
2022
Journal:  
Sağlık Bilimlerinde Değer
Author:  
Abstract:

Amaç: COVID-19’un etkeni olan SARS-CoV-2’nin replikasyonu sırasında sayısız varyantlar ortaya çıkmaktadır. İki bin yirmi yılının Eylül ayında İngiltere’de ortaya çıkan B.1.1.7 (İngiltere) varyantı da bunlardan biridir. Bu çalışmada B.1.1.7 varyantına bağlı gelişen COVID-19 nedeniyle takip edilen hastaların verilerini gözden geçirmeyi amaçladık. Gereç ve Yöntemler: Bu çalışma B.1.1.7 varyantının neden olduğu COVID-19 tanısıyla takip edilen toplam 50 hastanın verilerini içeren retrospektif bir çalışmadır. Hastalar yaş, cinsiyet, altta yatan hastalık, semptomlar ve laboratuar bulguları açısından incelendi. Bulgular: Çalışmaya alınan 50 hastanın 20’si (%40) kadın ve yaş ortalaması 59,4±16,3 idi. Onbir (%22) hastada lökositoz, dört (%8) hastada lökopeni, 24 (%48) hastada lenfopeni, 42 (%84) hastada C reaktif protein artışı, 28 (%56) hastada ferritin yüksekliği, 32 (%64) hastada laktat dehidrogenaz yüksekliği, 16 (%32) hastada d-dimer yüksekliği mevcuttu. Hastaların 45 (%90)’inde toraks bilgisayarlı tomografide tutulum mevcuttu. Grup 1 (n=36) ve grup 2 (n=14) karşılaştırıldığında, iki grup arasında lökosit, d-dimer ve prokalsitonin düzeyleri arasında istatistiksel olarak anlamlı fark mevcuttu (p değerleri sırasıyla p˂0,000, p=0,001, p=0,001). Sonuç: Sonuç olarak, B.1.1.7 varyantına sahip hastaları irdelediğimiz bu çalışmada ölen hastalarda lökosit, prokalsitonin ve d-dimer değerleri sağ kalan hastalara göre istatistiksel olarak anlamlı düzeyde daha yüksekti. Bu hastalardan elde ettiğimiz veriler varyant olmayan hastaların literatür verilerine benzerdi.

Keywords:

Evaluation Of Patients Followed Up With The Diagnosis Of Covid-19 Caused By The B.1.1.7 Sars Cov-2 Variant
2022
Author:  
Abstract:

Aim: During the replication of SARS-CoV-2, which is the causative agent of COVID-19, numerous variants emerge. The B.1.1.7 (England) variant, which appeared in England in September of the year 2000, is one of them. In this study, we aimed to review the data of patients followed up with a diagnosis of COVID-19 due to the B.1.1.7 variant. Matherial and Methods: This study is a retrospective study containing the data of a total of 50 patients followed up with the diagnosis of COVID-19 caused by the B.1.1.7 variant. Patients were examined in terms of age, gender, underlying disease, symptoms and laboratory findings. Results: Twenty (40%) of the 50 patients included in the study were female and the mean age was 59,4±16,3 years. Leukocytosis in 11 (22%) patients, leukopenia in 4 (8%) patients, lymphopenia in 24 (48%) patients, C-reactive protein increase in 42 (84%) patients, increased ferritin in 28 (56%) patients, and 32 (64%) patients lactate dehydrogenase elevation and d-dimer elevation were found in 16 (32%) patients. Forty-five (90%) patients had involvement in thorax computed tomography. When group 1 (n=36) and group 2 (n=14) were compared, there was a statistically significant difference between the leukocyte, d-dimer and procalcitonin levels between the two groups. (p˂0,000,p=0,001,p=0,001, respectively). Conclusion: In conclusion, in this study, in which we examined patients with the B.1.1.7 variant, leukocyte, procalcitonin and d-dimer values were statistically significantly higher in patients who died than in patients who survived. The data we obtained from these patients were similar to the literature data of the patients without variants.

Keywords:

Citation Owners
Information: There is no ciation to this publication.
Similar Articles












Sağlık Bilimlerinde Değer

Field :   Sağlık Bilimleri

Journal Type :   Uluslararası

Metrics
Article : 564
Cite : 2.607
2023 Impact : 0.131
Sağlık Bilimlerinde Değer