Kullanım Kılavuzu
Neden sadece 3 sonuç görüntüleyebiliyorum?
Sadece üye olan kurumların ağından bağlandığınız da tüm sonuçları görüntüleyebilirsiniz. Üye olmayan kurumlar için kurum yetkililerinin başvurması durumunda 1 aylık ücretsiz deneme sürümü açmaktayız.
Benim olmayan çok sonuç geliyor?
Birçok kaynakça da atıflar "Soyad, İ" olarak gösterildiği için özellikle Soyad ve isminin baş harfi aynı olan akademisyenlerin atıfları zaman zaman karışabilmektedir. Bu sorun tüm dünyadaki atıf dizinlerinin sıkça karşılaştığı bir sorundur.
Sadece ilgili makaleme yapılan atıfları nasıl görebilirim?
Makalenizin ismini arattıktan sonra detaylar kısmına bastığınız anda seçtiğiniz makaleye yapılan atıfları görebilirsiniz.
 Görüntüleme 20
 İndirme 2
İki Uçlu Bozuklukta Koruyucu Sağaltım
2014
Dergi:  
Journal Of Mood Disorders
Yazar:  
Özet:

Objective: The aim of this study was to determine the prophylactic treatment response and its relationship between clinical variables among the bipolar disorder patient group followed up in the Bipolar Disorder Unit of Psychiatry Department of Cukurova University Faculty of Medicine. Methods: One hundred patients, in euthymic period, diagnosed as bipolar disorder, were included in this study. “Affective Disorders Patient Registry Form” developed by our unit, SCID-I, Young Mani Rating Scale, Hamilton Depression Rating Scale, Prophylactic Treatment Response Scale (PTRS) were used in this study to collect the data. These forms were completed through the interviews with the patients and their relatives, and the evaluation of outpatient files. Results: In this study, 50 of the patients were female, 50 were male. A total of 153 maintenance periods of 100 bipolar patients were examined. In 60.24% of prophylactic treatment periods, mood stabilizers and antipsychotics were used together but only one type of mood stabilizer was used in 30.75% of prophylactic treatment periods. Most frequently preferred mood stabilizer was lithium (43.58%). The prophylactic treatment had an overall positive effect over the course of the illness. The average time to the first period after the prophylactic treatment was 13.32±30.7 (range=0-244) months and a significant decrease was determined in total number of epizodes, epizod frequency and the time with disease periods. When the response to prohylactic treatment was evaluated by PTRS, we determined that the full response rate was 43.8%. As the time with disease periods prolonged and the number of episodes each year got higher the need for antipsychotic use has been increased. Conclusion: Bipolar disorder is a lifelong disorder that disrupts functioning to a large extend. Because of that the consequence of prophylactic treatment is very important. When the prophylactic treatment is continued pregularly and carefully the time with disease periods decreases significantly. Developing scales that evaluate the effects of prophylactic treatment properly will help to determine specific drug treatments for the patients and their disease.

Anahtar Kelimeler:

Protecting from a two-way disorder
2014
Yazar:  
Özet:

Objective: The aim of this study was to determine the prophylactic treatment response and its relationship between clinical variables among the bipolar disorder patient group followed up in the Bipolar Disorder Unit of Psychiatry Department of Cukurova University Faculty of Medicine. Methods: One hundred patients, in euthymic period, diagnosed as bipolar disorder, were included in this study. "Affective Disorders Patient Registry Form" developed by our unit, SCID-I, Young Mani Rating Scale, Hamilton Depression Rating Scale, Prophylactic Treatment Response Scale (PTRS) were used in this study to collect the data. These forms were completed through the interviews with the patients and their relatives, and the evaluation of outpatient files. Results: In this study, 50 of the patients were female, 50 were male. A total of 153 maintenance periods of 100 bipolar patients were examined. In 60.24% of prophylactic treatment periods, mood stabilizers and antipsychotics were used together but only one type of mood stabilizer was used in 30.75% of prophylactic treatment periods. The most frequently preferred mood stabilizer was lithium (43.58%). The prophylactic treatment had a overall positive effect over the course of the disease. The average time to the first period after the prophylactic treatment was 13.32±30.7 (range=0-244) months and a significant decrease was determined in total number of episodes, episode frequency and the time with disease periods. When the response to prohylactic treatment was evaluated by PTRS, we determined that the full response rate was 43.8%. As the time with disease periods prolonged and the number of episodes each year got higher the need for antipsychotic use has been increased. Conclusion: Bipolar disorder is a lifelong disorder that disrupts functioning to a large extend. Because of that the consequence of prophylactic treatment is very important. When the prophylactic treatment is continued pregularly and carefully the time with the disease periods decreases significantly. Developing scales that evaluate the effects of prophylactic treatment properly will help to determine specific drug treatments for the patients and their disease.

Anahtar Kelimeler:

Atıf Yapanlar
Bilgi: Bu yayına herhangi bir atıf yapılmamıştır.
Benzer Makaleler










Journal Of Mood Disorders

Alan :   Sağlık Bilimleri

Dergi Türü :   Ulusal

Metrikler
Makale : 152
Atıf : 33
Journal Of Mood Disorders