User Guide
Why can I only view 3 results?
You can also view all results when you are connected from the network of member institutions only. For non-member institutions, we are opening a 1-month free trial version if institution officials apply.
So many results that aren't mine?
References in many bibliographies are sometimes referred to as "Surname, I", so the citations of academics whose Surname and initials are the same may occasionally interfere. This problem is often the case with citation indexes all over the world.
How can I see only citations to my article?
After searching the name of your article, you can see the references to the article you selected as soon as you click on the details section.
 Views 21
 Downloands 4
Hybrid Feature Extraction and Deep Learning Classifier Based Effective Classification for Twitter Sentiment Analysis
2023
Journal:  
International Journal of Intelligent Systems and Applications in Engineering
Author:  
Abstract:

Abstract Twitter is a widely used social media platform that is regarded as a crucial information source for gathering opinions, attitudes, reactions, and emotions from individuals. Therefore, the Twitter Sentiment Analysis (TSA) is developed for deciding the whether the textual tweets express a positive or negative opinion. The abundance of slang phrases and poor spellings in short sentence formats make it challenging to analyze Twitter data, nevertheless. In this paper, Hybrid Feature Extraction (HFE) is proposed along with the deep learning classifier to improve the classification. The HFE is the combination of Bag of Word (BoW) and FastText Word Embedding (FTWE) techniques that are used to extract the syntactic information and semantic information-related features from the tweets. The deep learning classifier namely Long Short-Term Memory (LSTM) with Softmax Regression Model (SRM) is used to classify the tweets as positive and negative. The datasets used to analyze the proposed HFE-LSTM-SRM method are Twitter and Sentiment140 datasets. The HFE-LSTM-SRM is analyzed by means of accuracy, precision, recall, F1-measure, and average computational time. The HFE-LSTM-SRM is evaluated using current techniques like Robustly Optimized Bidirectional Encoder Representations from Transformers (ROBERT-LSTM) and Spider-Monkey-Optimizer with K-Means Algorithm (SMOK). HFE-LSTM-SRM is more accurate than ROBERT-LSTM for the Sentiment140 dataset at 98.87%.

Keywords:

Citation Owners
Information: There is no ciation to this publication.
Similar Articles








International Journal of Intelligent Systems and Applications in Engineering

Field :   Mühendislik

Journal Type :   Uluslararası

Metrics
Article : 1.632
Cite : 488
2023 Impact : 0.054
International Journal of Intelligent Systems and Applications in Engineering