Özet:

This study was conducted between 2016-2019 to determine whether the species in the labels of the recommended herbicides in the grain farm areas, by identifying the main harmful, potentially main harmful, harmful or beneficial foreign herbs for the Çukurova region, are given or not to the beneficial. The study compared the species of foreign herbs found in the original herbicide labels used in grain with the density of species identified in foreign herbs survey in the region since 1984 as a peak/m2 and percentage coverage area with the "economic damage limits" identified in our country and world literature. Foreign grass species that pass the "economic damage threshold" of their intensity have been identified as the main harmful of the culture plant in which they are located. The species that are determined not to exceed the economic damage threshold but have the potential to exceed and may cause loss of productivity in the product are called the potential main harmful foreign herbs. Except for those that cause loss of productivity in products and toxic, toxic, allergic, thin, dirty, painful, adhesive, etc. Foreign herbs with properties are considered to be harmful foreign herbs.In the study, many of the foreign herbs found on herbicite labels and given herbicite doses are not harmful and nitrogen bonding to the soil, guesting beneficial insects, repellent and trap plants, traditionally painting, medical support plants, used in nutrition, etc. It is found that there are useful species. As a result, the grain in the grain is dried wild yellow (Avena sterilis L. ) and Wild Hardal (Sinapis arvensis L.) is identified as the main harmful species, and the herbicides used in the region should be used according to the Economic Damage Frontier of these two foreign herbicides and the creation of the doses of herbicides according to these two species environmental protection, food safety, herbicide resistance problems, etc. because of the importance.

Anahtar Kelimeler: