User Guide
Why can I only view 3 results?
You can also view all results when you are connected from the network of member institutions only. For non-member institutions, we are opening a 1-month free trial version if institution officials apply.
So many results that aren't mine?
References in many bibliographies are sometimes referred to as "Surname, I", so the citations of academics whose Surname and initials are the same may occasionally interfere. This problem is often the case with citation indexes all over the world.
How can I see only citations to my article?
After searching the name of your article, you can see the references to the article you selected as soon as you click on the details section.
 Views 31
 Downloands 4
Reference ranges of nasal bone length, pre-nasal thickness, and pre-nasal thickness-to-nasal bone length ratio in low-risk pregnant women: A retrospective and cohort study from Türkiye
2022
Journal:  
Zeynep Kamil Tıp Bülteni
Author:  
Abstract:

INTRODUCTION: The aim of this study was to determine the reference ranges of second trimester nasal bone length (NBL), pre-nasal thickness (PT), and PT/NBL ratios of low-risk pregnant women in Turkish population. METHODS: Pregnant women of 16–28th gestational age who underwent ultrasonographic fetal screening between November 2021 and June 2022 were retrospectively analyzed. Fetuses with congenital malformations, high risk in antenatal screening tests, diagnosed with aneuploidy, and pregnant women of non-Turkish ethnic origin were excluded from the study. Fetuses were classified as ≤19+6 weeks, 20+0–20+6 weeks, 21+0–21+6 weeks, 22+0–22+6 weeks, 23+0–23+6 weeks, and ≥24+0 weeks. NBL, PT, and PT/NBL ratio was evaluated for each gestational age separately. RESULTS: A total of 242 fetuses were included in the study. The mean NBL and mean PT increased with gestational age (6.42±0.65 at 20+0–20+6 weeks versus 7.65±0.79 at 23+0–23+6 weeks and 3.10±0.62 at 20+0–20+6 weeks vs. 3.55±0.63 at 23+0–23+6 weeks, respectively). Both NBL and PT were positively correlated with gestational age whereas the PT/NBL ratio was constant throughout the second trimester (PCC=0.81, p<0.001, PCC=0.56, p<0.001, and PCC=−0.07, p=0.255, respectively). The mean PT/NBL ratio in the second trimester was calculated as 0.46 (95% CI, 0.45–0.47, 5th p=0.35 and 95th p=0.62). DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSION: The reference ranges for NBL, PT, and PT/NBL ratio may vary in different populations. Therefore, the use of population-specific nomograms may lead to higher success rates in Down syndrome screening.

Keywords:

2022
Author:  
0
2022
Author:  
Citation Owners
Information: There is no ciation to this publication.
Similar Articles








Zeynep Kamil Tıp Bülteni

Field :   Sağlık Bilimleri

Journal Type :   Ulusal

Metrics
Article : 595
Cite : 351
Zeynep Kamil Tıp Bülteni