Özet:

This study reveals Deleuze and Guattari’s criticism of the subject of construction through their “dramatization” and “demand-machines” conceptualizations. The goal here is to show that through both conceptualization, the construction criticism in Deleuze and Guattari has opened the door to the idea of an unsubstantial subjectivity production. Deleuze, by the way of dramatization, saves the idea from the cause of the concept and pulls it into the field of the pure event, while with the theory of the desire-machines he developed with Guattari, he also connects the desire from the possible object that someone else expressed/will gain through, by saves it from the cause of a body, for a pure reason. The most important thing here is the object, representation-production, etc. Instead of being replaced by the duality, it is necessary to show that the idea exists before such dualism. From Deleuze and Guattari’s point of view, the main issue is not to deny the dualism itself. Dualism finds the body as the distribution patterns of heterogeneous relationships, i.e. as a secondary effect (epifenomen). The problem of the thinkers is to destroy the representation established by dualism forever, and thus to prevent these divisions from appearing as dual. The same applies to the construction idea. In Deleuze and Guattari, through the theory of mechanical processes, the structure only and only arises as a secondary effect, which means it does not take on a founding function.

Anahtar Kelimeler: