User Guide
Why can I only view 3 results?
You can also view all results when you are connected from the network of member institutions only. For non-member institutions, we are opening a 1-month free trial version if institution officials apply.
So many results that aren't mine?
References in many bibliographies are sometimes referred to as "Surname, I", so the citations of academics whose Surname and initials are the same may occasionally interfere. This problem is often the case with citation indexes all over the world.
How can I see only citations to my article?
After searching the name of your article, you can see the references to the article you selected as soon as you click on the details section.
 Views 62
 Downloands 14
DEVELOPING INTERNALIZED SEXISM SCALE FOR WOMEN: A VALIDITY AND RELIABILITY STUDY
2020
Journal:  
International Journal of Eurasian Education and Culture
Author:  
Abstract:

Sexism refers to beliefs, behaviors and institutional practices that contribute to the protection of existing gender inequality in society, harming individuals, affects all genders but it mostly affects women. Internalized sexism is the sexism that women direct to themselves or other women. Since internalized sexism differs from directly visible sexism, it often remains unnoticed and hinders an effective fight against gender inequality. Thus, developing an instrument to measure internalized sexism is of great significance. This study aims to develop a measurement tool to measure internalized sexism in women. In this study, data were collected from 1088 female participants, ages 18-53 from three different study groups. Content validity, construct validity and reliability studies were conducted in the scale development process. The results of the Exploratory Factor Analysis showed that the scale comprised of 5 sub-dimensions as Self-Objectification, Derogation, Loss of Self/Internalized Powerlessness, Competition/Self-Separation, and Male Prioritization) and this construct was then tested in a different study group with First and Second-Order Confirmatory Factor Analysis. The Cronbach’s Alpha internal consistency was 0.84 for the whole Internalized Sexism Scale, 0.75 for Self-Objectification subscale, 0.75 for Derogation, 0.71 for Internalized Powerlessness, 0.71 for Self-Separation, and 0.66 for Male Prioritization. The test-retest reliability for the whole scale was 0.76, 0.76 for Self-Objectification subscale, 0.69 for Loss of Self/Internalized Powerlessness, 0.73 for Self-Separation, and 0.64 for Male Prioritization. As a result of the validity and reliability analyses, it can be stated that the scale is a valid and reliable measurement tool.

Keywords:

DEVELOPING INTERNALIZED SEXISM SCALE FOR WOMEN: A VALIDITY AND RELIABILITY STUDY
2020
Author:  
Abstract:

Sexism refers to beliefs, behaviors and institutional practices that contribute to the protection of existing gender inequality in society, harming individuals, affects all gender but it mostly affects women. Internalized sexism is the sexism that women direct to themselves or other women. Since internalized sexism differs from directly visible sexism, it often remains unnoticed and prevents an effective fight against gender inequality. Thus, developing an instrument to measure internalized sexism is of great significance. This study aims to develop a measurement tool to measure internalized sexism in women. In this study, data were collected from 1088 female participants, ages 18-53 from three different study groups. Content validity, construct validity and reliability studies were conducted in the scale development process. The results of the Exploratory Factor Analysis showed that the scale comprised of 5 sub-dimensions as Self-Objectification, Derogation, Loss of Self/Internalized Powerlessness, Competition/Self-Separation, and Male Prioritization) and this construct was then tested in a different study group with First and Second-Order Confirmatory Factor Analysis. The Cronbach's Alpha internal consistency was 0.84 for the whole Internalized Sexism Scale, 0.75 for Self-Objectification subscale, 0.75 for Derogation, 0.71 for Internalized Powerlessness, 0.71 for Self-Separation, and 0.66 for Male Prioritization. The test-retest reliability for the whole scale was 0.76, 0. 76 for Self-Objectification subscale, 0.69 for Loss of Self/Internalized Powerlessness, 0.73 for Self-Separation, and 0.64 for Male Prioritization. As a result of the validity and reliability analyses, it can be stated that the scale is a valid and reliable measurement tool.

Keywords:

Citation Owners
Information: There is no ciation to this publication.
Similar Articles












International Journal of Eurasian Education and Culture

Field :   Eğitim Bilimleri; Sosyal, Beşeri ve İdari Bilimler

Journal Type :   Uluslararası

Metrics
Article : 385
Cite : 136
2023 Impact : 0.026
International Journal of Eurasian Education and Culture