Kullanım Kılavuzu
Neden sadece 3 sonuç görüntüleyebiliyorum?
Sadece üye olan kurumların ağından bağlandığınız da tüm sonuçları görüntüleyebilirsiniz. Üye olmayan kurumlar için kurum yetkililerinin başvurması durumunda 1 aylık ücretsiz deneme sürümü açmaktayız.
Benim olmayan çok sonuç geliyor?
Birçok kaynakça da atıflar "Soyad, İ" olarak gösterildiği için özellikle Soyad ve isminin baş harfi aynı olan akademisyenlerin atıfları zaman zaman karışabilmektedir. Bu sorun tüm dünyadaki atıf dizinlerinin sıkça karşılaştığı bir sorundur.
Sadece ilgili makaleme yapılan atıfları nasıl görebilirim?
Makalenizin ismini arattıktan sonra detaylar kısmına bastığınız anda seçtiğiniz makaleye yapılan atıfları görebilirsiniz.
 Görüntüleme 12
 İndirme 3
CARDIAC MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING (CMRI) VS TRANSTHORACIC ECHOCARDIOGRAPHY FOR THE ASSESSMENT OF CARDIAC VOLUMES & REGIONAL FUNCTION: A COMPARATIVE STUDY
2019
Dergi:  
Pakistan Armed Forces Medical Journal
Yazar:  
Özet:

Objective: to establish and compare metrics of cardiac volumes and function between CMRI and echo-cardiography in patients presenting for imaging evaluation of their cardiac function. Study Design: Comparative cross-sectional study. Place and Duration of Study: Magnetic Resonance Imaging Department of AFIC & NIHD Rawalpindi, from July 2018 till December 2018. Material and Methods: All the patients who reported for their cardiac magnetic resonance imaging during our study duration due to atypical chest pain or suspected coronary artery disease were recruited in the study while patients with prosthetic valve, cardiac devices or claustrophobic patients were excluded. Data was collected after the informed consent of the patients. Cardiac Volumes and LVEF were measured using Simpson's biplane method in transthoracic echocardiography while in MRI analysis Ejection fraction was assessed by evaluation of the volumes of the endocardial contours in diastole and systole of the short-axis images. The included slice closest to mitral valve plane had myocardium in at least two-third of the circumference of the left ventricle. CMRI and Echo report parameters of the patients were entered and analyzed using SPSS version 23. Results: Data of fifty patients were collected for the study out of which 42 (84.0%) were male patients while 8(16.0%) were female patients. Mean age of the patients was 53.4 ± 3 years. We found out that EF and other measured parameters were rather similar with cardiac MRI; as demonstrated with small mean differences. Mean left ventricular ejection fraction by cardiac MRI was 65% while mean left ventricular ejection fraction by echocardiography wad 55%. The mean LV End Diastolic Volume measured with MRI was statistically significant (<0.001) when compared with mean LV End Diastolic Volume measured by echocardiography. Conclusion: Our study suggested that both the cardiac imaging modalities measured cardiac dimensions, volumes and functions closely similar as demonstrated by a very small bias. However, further study with large population is suggested.

Anahtar Kelimeler:

Atıf Yapanlar
Bilgi: Bu yayına herhangi bir atıf yapılmamıştır.
Benzer Makaleler












Pakistan Armed Forces Medical Journal

Alan :   Sağlık Bilimleri

Dergi Türü :   Uluslararası

Metrikler
Makale : 2.236
Atıf : 131
2023 Impact/Etki : 0.002
Pakistan Armed Forces Medical Journal