Özet:

The problem of curse to Muawiyah and Yazid Abdullah NAMLI Dr. Member, Nevşehir Hacı Bektaş Veli University, Theological Faculty, Kelam and Islamic Mezhepleri History Anabily Department Assistant Professor Dr., Nevşehir Hacı Bektaş Veli University, Faculty of Theology, Department of Kalām and History of Islamic Sects, Nevşehir / Turkey [email protected] ORCID ID: 0000-0001-7099-3018 Self Muâviye, by fighting, caused bloodshed and by doing various political movements, captured and converted it into a sovereignty. Then he gave his son, Yehuda, and he gave him his son, and he gave him his son. It was not a person that Muslims wanted to see as a khalifa. His religious life, pleasure and sefa in some harms and behaviors that are not in accordance with the caliphal authority, prevented him from being accepted by a legitimate caliph. in the hs. The murder of Hussein, the Harre massacre, the enclosure of Mekka and the stone holding of the Cave are great catastrophes that make the legitimacy of Yeshid controversial, deep wounds in the hearts of Muslims. He and his son, Isaiah, are the people of the world, and they are the people of the world, and they are the people of the world. The results of the work of Yeshid continue to be influenced today. He is a non-governmental leader. And after the death of Isaiah, the people of Shia had an understanding of the curse of him. Some of the people who were affected by the shia also participated in the curse of the curse. The majority of Muslims have a cautious approach to the curse of the Yeshid as well as to find it wrong. by Hz. Those who are wrong with Hussein are those who ignore some aspects of the matter, and they are ignorant. Their minds are only connected to themselves. But there is no clear evidence, and some of them have judged the unbelief of Yehuda. Keywords: Kelām, Kelām History, Islamic Messages History, Political Theology, Hilâfet, Muâviye, Yezîd, Lânet.   Abstract Muawiyah is the one who fights, takes blood and plots the caliphate with various intrigues and turns him into the sultanate. After him, he appointed his king Yazid as heir to the Crown Prince and Umayyad consolidated his reign. Yazid was not a personality that Muslims wanted to see as a caliph. His life contrary to religion, immersion into certain illicits in pleasure and enjoyment and behaviors that do not correspond to the caliphate position have prevented him from being a legitimate caliph. The martyrdom of Hussein in Karbala, the Harre massacre, the siege of Mecca and the keeping of the Kaaba are the major disasters that make the legitimacy of Yazid question controversial and deeply wounded in the hearts of Muslims. Muawiyah and his last Yazid are two characters who shatter the Islamic Ummah. The consequences of the crimes committed by Yazid still continue today. He is the de facto state administrator without legitimacy. For this reason, after the death of Yazid, the Shia groups had an understanding that cursing him is permissible. Some people affected by Shia are also involved in the curse. The majority of Muslims find Yazid unfair and have a cautious approach to curse. Those who find Hussein's unjust in the revolting are those who neglect and ignore some aspects of the issue. Their individual thoughts bind only themselves. Although there is no clear evidence, some of the excesses have ruled Yazid's disbelief. Keywords: Kalām (Islamic Theology), History of Kalām, History of Islamic Sects, Politic Theology, Caliphate, Muawiyah, Yazid, Curse.

Anahtar Kelimeler: