Abstract:

Abstract With the entry into force of the regime of participation in acquired goods from 01.01.2002, there have been significant developments in the goods regime. Even though the regime of participating to acquired property has made significant benefits and gains in gender equality, it also has some difficulties in practice. The objective of presenting this paper is to analyze "Participation Asset" in accordance with the differences of opinion in doctrine and the decisions of the Supreme Court. Especially, different arguments on certain topics bring several problems in practice. Aim: This study, aimed to examine the issue of participation receivables, which came to an important point as a result of the change in the law, was adopted as a legal goods regime. Methodology: During the preparation of the study, a detailed explanation was given on the issues of the regime of participating to acquired property and the participation asset. The legal characteristics were scrutinized in consideration of the controversial topics on the participation asset. Findings: There are many differences of opinion regarding the statute of limitations of the participation fee. Furthermore, certain controversial topics on the calculation of the participation asset were also identified. Legal regulations should be made to prevent these problems both in the doctrine and the Supreme Court. Authenticity: It is an authentic article for those who want to have information about how to participate.

Keywords: