Görüntüleme
16
İndirme
1
Amaç: Bu çalışmanın amacı 10 mm’nin altında kemik yüksekliğine sahip bölgelerde yerleştirilen kısa implantların ortalama 19 aylık takip süresinde, implant klinik başarısının araştırılması ve marjinal kemik kaybının, implantın lokasyonuna, kron/ implant oranına ve hastanın cinsiyeti, yaşı ve sigara kullanımı gibi parametrelere göre değerlendirilmesidir. Gereç ve Yöntem: Bu çalışmada yaşları 20-82 arasında değişen 64 hastaya toplamda 101 adet implant yerleştirildi. İmplantlar 10 hafta iyileşme sürecini takiben yüklendiler. Marjinal kemik kayıpları başlangıç ve ortalama 19 ay sonrasında ölçüldü. Hastaların implant çevre kemik doku kaybı implant ve hastaya bağlı parametrelere göre değerlendirildi. Ayrıca klinik takip süresi sonundaki yaşam ömürleri hesaplandı. Bulgular: Çalışmamızda 19 aylık takip süresinde implantlarda ki başarı oranı %98 dir. İmplantların takip süresi içerisindeki ortalama marjinal kemik kaybı 0,33 ± 0,19 mm olarak bulundu. Kısa implantlarda kron/implant oranının marjinal kemik kaybına etkisi istatistiksel olarak anlamlı bulundu. Ayrıca hastanın yaşı ve sigara kullanımın da marjinal kemik kaybına etkisi istatiksel olarak anlamlı bulundu. Buna karşın hastanın cinsiyetinin marjinal kemik kaybına etkisi istatiksel olarak anlamlı tespit edilmedi. Sonuç: Bu kısa dönem takip çalışması standart uzun dental implantların uygulanamadığı vakalarda kısa dental implantlantların kullanımının ortalama 19 aylık dönemde başarılı olduğunu tespit etmiştir. Ancak daha kesin verilere ulaşabilmek için uzun dönem takip çalışmaları gerekmektedir. Anahtar Kelimeler: dental implant, panoramik radyografi, başarı. THE SUCCESS RATES OF SHORT IMPLANTS IN A 19 MONTHS RETROSPECTIVE EVALUATİON ABSTRACT Aim: The aim of this study is the evaluation of the success rate of short implants in patients who have less than 10 mm alveolar bone in posterior regions of maxilla and mandible in average 19 months follow-up time. And evaluation of the marginal bone loss around implants according to patient related parameters as smoking, age, gender and implant related parameters as location and crown/implant ratio. Materials and Methods: One hundred and one implants were placed in 64 patients and loaded with final restorations after 10 weeks of healing time. Marginal bone loss around implants was determined radiographically at initial and after a mean observation time average of 19 months. The effect of smoking habit, age, gender, implant location and crown/implant ratio on the marginal bone loss was evaluated. The survival rate of the implants was determined. Results: The overall cumulative survival rate of short implants in 19 months was 98%. The mean marginal bone loss value for the short implants was 0,33 ± 0,19 mm. Marginal bone loss was affected by the crown/implant ratio, location, patients’ smoking habit and age but not the gender of the patient. Conclusion: With short dental implants, successful clinical results could be achieved in patients who have less than 10 mm alveolar bone in posterior regions of maxilla and mandible up to 19 months of short follow-up time. Long term studies are needed for short dental implants. Key words: dental implant, panoramic radiograph, success.
The aim of this study is to investigate the clinical success of short implants placed in areas with bone height below 10 mm for an average of 19 months, and to evaluate marginal bone loss according to the location of the implant, the crown/implant ratio and the patient’s gender, age and smoking. In this study, a total of 101 implants were placed on 64 patients aged 20-82. The implants were charged 10 weeks after the healing process. Marginal bone loss was measured after the beginning and an average of 19 months. The patient’s implant environmental bone tissue loss was assessed according to the implant and the patient-related parameters. The clinical follow-up period was also calculated at the end of life. Results: In our study, the success rate in implants during the 19 months of follow-up period is 98%. The average marginal bone loss during the tracking time of the implants was 0.33 ± 0.19 mm. The impact of the crown/implant ratio on marginal bone loss in short implants was statistically significant. The patient’s age and smoking effects on marginal bone loss were statistically significant. However, the effect of the patient's gender on marginal bone loss has not been statically significantly identified. This short-term follow-up study found that short dental implants were successful in the average period of 19 months in cases where standard long dental implants were not applied. However, long-term tracking work is needed to get to more accurate data. Keywords: dental implant, panoramic radiography, success. The goal of this study is the evaluation of the success rate of short implants in patients who have less than 10 mm alveolar bone in posterior regions of maxilla and mandible in average 19 months follow-up time. And evaluation of the marginal bone loss around implants according to patient related parameters as smoking, age, gender and implant related parameters as location and crown/implant ratio. Materials and Methods: One hundred and one implants were placed in 64 patients and loaded with final restorations after 10 weeks of healing time. Marginal bone loss around implants was determined radiographically at initial and after an average observation time average of 19 months. The effect of smoking habit, age, gender, implant location and crown/implant ratio on the marginal bone loss was evaluated. The survival rate of the implants was determined. Results: The overall cumulative survival rate of short implants in 19 months was 98%. The average marginal bone loss value for the short implants was 0.33 ± 0.19 mm. Marginal bone loss was affected by the crown/implant ratio, location, patients' smoking habit and age but not the gender of the patient. Conclusion: With short dental implants, successful clinical results could be achieved in patients who have less than 10 mm alveolar bone in posterior regions of maxilla and mandible up to 19 months of short follow-up time. Long-term studies are needed for short dental implants. Key words: dental implant, panoramic radiograph, success.
Dergi Türü : Ulusal
Makale Detay 
Benzer Makaleler
PDF Görüntüle
Dergi Bilgisi
Eseri Dinleyin
Alıntı Yap
Bu Sayfayı Yazdırın
Paylaş
Mendeley
