User Guide
Why can I only view 3 results?
You can also view all results when you are connected from the network of member institutions only. For non-member institutions, we are opening a 1-month free trial version if institution officials apply.
So many results that aren't mine?
References in many bibliographies are sometimes referred to as "Surname, I", so the citations of academics whose Surname and initials are the same may occasionally interfere. This problem is often the case with citation indexes all over the world.
How can I see only citations to my article?
After searching the name of your article, you can see the references to the article you selected as soon as you click on the details section.
 Views 8
 Downloands 1
EKOMEDYA OKURYAZARLIĞI ALGI ÖLÇEĞİ: GEÇERLİK VE GÜVENİRLİK ÇALIŞMASI
2023
Journal:  
International Journal of Language Academy
Author:  
Abstract:

Bu çalışmanın amacı öğretmenlerin ekomedya okuryazarlığına ilişkin algılarını ortaya koyan bir ölçek geliştirmektir. Ölçeği geliştirme aşamasında alanyazın incelenerek ve alan uzmanlarının görüşleri alınarak bir madde havuzu oluşturulmuştur. Sonra maddelerin amaca hizmet edip etmediği açısından ölçek geliştirme konusunda uzman akademisyenlerin görüşlerine, dil ve anlatım yeterliliği açısından da dil anlatım uzmanlarının görüşlerine başvurulmuştur. Bu görüşler doğrultusunda 27 maddeden oluşan taslak ölçek Van ilinde görev yapan 214 öğretmene uygulanmıştır. Faktör döndürme yöntemlerinden biri olan Obligue Rotatiton uygulanarak faktör yükü ,30’un altında olan 11 madde ölçekten çıkartılmıştır. AFA sonucu elde edilen 16 madde için doğrulayıcı faktör analizi yapılmıştır. 16 madde ile yapılan AFA sonucunda ölçeğin KMO değerinin 0,50’nin (KMO=0.811, p<0.00) üstünde olduğu ve ölçeğin özdeğeri 1,00’den büyük toplam varyansın yaklaşık % 50,32’sini açıklayan üç faktörlü bir yapıya sahip olduğu tespit edilmiştir. Doğrulayıcı faktör analizi ile model uyum indekslerine bakılmış. Önemli uyum indekslerinden olan X2/df (1,626≤ 3), RMSEA (0,53≤ .08), AGFI (,890 ≤ .90), CFI (,932≤ .95) ve TLI (,91≤ .95) değerlerinin kabul edilebilir değerler arasında olduğu tespit edilmiştir. Ölçeğin iç tutarlılık anlamında güvenirliğini belirlemek için Cronbach’s Alpha (α=.817) değerine bakılmıştır. Sonuç olarak hem AFA hem de DFA analizleri sonucunda ölçeğin öğretmenlerin ekomedya okuryazarlığı ile ilgili algı düzeylerini tespit eden geçerli ve güvenilir bir ölçek olduğu söylenebilir.

Keywords:

Economic Readiness Algae Measurement: Effectiveness and Safety
2023
Author:  
Abstract:

The aim of this study is to develop a scale that reveals teachers' perceptions of ecomedical literature. At the stage of the development of the scale, a material pool was created by examining the area and taking the views of the field experts. Then the opinions of specialized academics on the development of scale in terms of whether the materials serve the purpose or not, and the opinions of language and narrative qualifications in terms of language and narrative qualifications were also referred to. According to these opinions, the draft scale consisting of 27 articles was applied to 214 teachers working in the Van province. The factor load is removed from the scale of 11 substances under 30 by using Obligue Rotatiton. A verifying factor analysis was made for the 16 results obtained by the AFA. The AFA result of 16 matters was found that the scale's KMO value was above 0.50 (KMO=0.811, p<0.00) and that the scale's identity had a three-factor structure that describes about 50.32% of the total variance greater than 1.00. The verifying factor analysis and the model conformity index were looked at. The values of X2/df (1,626 ≤ 3), RMSEA (0,53 ≤ .08), AGFI (,890 ≤ .90), CFI (,932 ≤ .95) and TLI (,91 ≤ .95) are among acceptable values. Cronbach’s Alpha (α=.817) is considered to determine the reliability of the measure in terms of internal consistency. As a result, both AFA and DFA analysis can be said that the scale is a valid and reliable scale that determines the teachers' perception levels related to ecomedical literature.

Keywords:

Ecomedia Literacy Perception Scale: A Validity and Reliability Study
2023
Author:  
Abstract:

This study aims to develop a scale that reveals teachers' perceptions of ecomedia literacy. During the development of the scale, an item pool was created by examining the literature and taking the opinions of field experts. Then, in terms of whether the items serve the purpose or not, the opinions of academicians who are experts in scale development and terms of language and expression proficiency, the opinions of language expression experts were consulted. In line with these opinions, the draft scale consisting of 27 items was applied to 214 teachers working in the province of Van. By applying Obligue Rotatiton, one of the factor rotation methods, 11 items with a factor load below .30 were removed from the scale. Afterward, exploratory, and confirmatory factor analyses were performed for the validity and reliability calculations of the remaining 16-item scale. As a result of EFA with 16 items, the KMO value of the scale is above 0.50 (KMO=0.811, p<0.00), and the scale has a 3-factor structure that explains approximately 50.32% of the total variance with an eigenvalue greater than 1.00. detected. Model fit indices were examined with confirmatory factor analysis. X2/df (1.626≤ 3), RMSEA (0.53≤ .08), AGFI (.890 ≤ .90), CFI (.932≤ .95), and TLI (.91≤ .95) values, which are important fit indices was found to be within acceptable values. To determine the reliability level of the scale, the Cronbach's Alpha (α=.817) value, which is a measure of internal consistency, was checked. As a result, because of both EFA and CFA analyses, it can be said that the scale is a valid and reliable scale that determines the level of opinions of teachers about ecomedia literacy.

Keywords:

Citation Owners
Information: There is no ciation to this publication.
Similar Articles








International Journal of Language Academy

Field :   Eğitim Bilimleri; Filoloji

Journal Type :   Uluslararası

Metrics
Article : 1.247
Cite : 1.594
International Journal of Language Academy