Kullanım Kılavuzu
Neden sadece 3 sonuç görüntüleyebiliyorum?
Sadece üye olan kurumların ağından bağlandığınız da tüm sonuçları görüntüleyebilirsiniz. Üye olmayan kurumlar için kurum yetkililerinin başvurması durumunda 1 aylık ücretsiz deneme sürümü açmaktayız.
Benim olmayan çok sonuç geliyor?
Birçok kaynakça da atıflar "Soyad, İ" olarak gösterildiği için özellikle Soyad ve isminin baş harfi aynı olan akademisyenlerin atıfları zaman zaman karışabilmektedir. Bu sorun tüm dünyadaki atıf dizinlerinin sıkça karşılaştığı bir sorundur.
Sadece ilgili makaleme yapılan atıfları nasıl görebilirim?
Makalenizin ismini arattıktan sonra detaylar kısmına bastığınız anda seçtiğiniz makaleye yapılan atıfları görebilirsiniz.
 Görüntüleme 20
 İndirme 5
The Effect of Cooperative Integrated Reading and Composition Learning Models and Student Team Achievement Divisions on Learning Results and Collaboration of Students in Nursing Theory Material
2019
Dergi:  
Indonesian Nursing Journal of Education and Clinic
Yazar:  
Özet:

Introduction: An understanding of nursing theory requires critical thinking skills. Therefore effective learning methods are needed to improve student understanding. One method of learning that can overcome this is the Cooperative Integrated Reading and Composition (CIRC) method and the Student Team Achievement Divisions (STAD) method. The aim was to analyze the effectiveness of CIRC learning models and STAD Method on student learning outcomes and collaboration. Methods: This study used a quasi-experimental method consisting of two experimental groups with the study design was a post-test design with two comparison treatments. The population in this study were all semester two undergraduate students nursing as many as 30 people divided into two groups—the sampling technique conducted by total sampling. We analyzed the data using the Mann Whitney test with α ≤ 0.05. Results: The mean rank of learning outcomes in the CIRC method was 19.43, and the STAD method was 11.57. The p-value was 0.007 (<0.05), which means that there was a significant difference between learning outcomes in the CIRC group and the STAD group. The mean rank value for student collaboration on the CIRC method was 15.50, and the STAD method was 15.50. The p-value was 1,000 (>0.05), which means there was no significant difference between the collaboration in the CIRC group and the STAD group. Conclussions: There were significant differences between learning outcomes in the CIRC group and the STAD Group. However, there was no significant difference between collaboration in both groups.

Anahtar Kelimeler:

Atıf Yapanlar
Bilgi: Bu yayına herhangi bir atıf yapılmamıştır.
Benzer Makaleler








Indonesian Nursing Journal of Education and Clinic

Alan :   Sağlık Bilimleri

Dergi Türü :   Uluslararası

Metrikler
Makale : 219
Atıf : 28
Indonesian Nursing Journal of Education and Clinic