Kullanım Kılavuzu
Neden sadece 3 sonuç görüntüleyebiliyorum?
Sadece üye olan kurumların ağından bağlandığınız da tüm sonuçları görüntüleyebilirsiniz. Üye olmayan kurumlar için kurum yetkililerinin başvurması durumunda 1 aylık ücretsiz deneme sürümü açmaktayız.
Benim olmayan çok sonuç geliyor?
Birçok kaynakça da atıflar "Soyad, İ" olarak gösterildiği için özellikle Soyad ve isminin baş harfi aynı olan akademisyenlerin atıfları zaman zaman karışabilmektedir. Bu sorun tüm dünyadaki atıf dizinlerinin sıkça karşılaştığı bir sorundur.
Sadece ilgili makaleme yapılan atıfları nasıl görebilirim?
Makalenizin ismini arattıktan sonra detaylar kısmına bastığınız anda seçtiğiniz makaleye yapılan atıfları görebilirsiniz.
  Atıf Sayısı 1
 Görüntüleme 20
The choice of renal replacement modality in an intensive care unit: which factors are predictive ?
2019
Dergi:  
Tepecik Eğitim ve Araştırma Hastanesi Dergisi
Yazar:  
Özet:

INTRODUCTION: The incidence of acute kidney injury (AKI) in intensive care units (ICU) has been increasing due to increasing age, multiple associated co-morbidities, application of invasive procedures, and high disease-severity scores. The impact of choice of a convenient and effective renal replacement therapy (RRT) modality is utmost importance. So far there has been no clear concensus on the choice of RRT modality. This study was conducted to estimate the predictive factors that determine the clinician’s choice of initial RRT modality in ICU-AKI patients. METHODS: Between January 2016 and December 2017 the patients admitted to ICU more than three days who developed AKI were recruited. The data was obtained retrospectively from electronical data system and included demographics, clinical, and laboratory features. According to choice of initial RRT modality patients were divided into two groups; intermittant hemodialysis (HD) and continuous venovenous hemodiafiltration (CVVHDF) groups. The factors that determined the modality choice was analyzed by logistic regression. In-hospital mortality rate was calculated regarding the type of modality. RESULTS: Out of 1806 patients admitted to ICU 171 patients (9.46%, 97 males, 74 females, mean age of 67.47±15.60 years) developed AKI requiring RRT. The mean hospital stay was 8.41±10.26 days. Between HD (n=93, 54.1%) and CVVHDF (n=78, 45.3%) groups age, gender, associated co-morbidities and hospital-stay days did not differ significantly. Logistic regression analysis revealed that sepsis and cardiological disorders, mean arterial pressure (MAP) <75 mmHg, high SAPS II scores, use of vasopressors and inotropes, high lactate levels, and urinary output of <0.25 ml/kg/h were associated with the choice of CRRT. DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSION: The factors suggesting the choice of RRT modality type in ICU are not clear. We emphasized that some parameters related to patient’s demographics, clinics and laboratory data affect the clinician’s choice.

Anahtar Kelimeler:

The choice of renal replacement modality in an intensive care unit: which factors are predictive ?
2019
Yazar:  
Özet:

The incidence of acute kidney injury (AKI) in intensive care units (ICU) has been increasing due to increasing age, multiple associated co-morbidities, application of invasive procedures, and high disease-severity scores. The impact of the choice of a convenient and effective renal replacement therapy (RRT) modality is utmost importance. So far there has been no clear consensus on the choice of RRT modality. This study was conducted to estimate the predictive factors that determine the clinic's choice of initial RRT modality in ICU-AKI patients. METHODS: Between January 2016 and December 2017 the patients admitted to ICU more than three days who developed AKI were recruited. The data was obtained retrospectively from electronic data system and included demographics, clinical, and laboratory features. According to the choice of initial RRT modality patients were divided into two groups; intermittent hemodialysis (HD) and continuous venovenous hemodiafiltration (CVVHDF) groups. The factors that determined the modality choice was analyzed by logistic regression. In-hospital mortality rate was calculated regarding the type of modality. Results: Out of 1806 patients admitted to ICU 171 patients (9.46%, 97 males, 74 females, average age of 67.47±15.60 years) developed AKI requiring RRT. The average hospital stay was 8.41±10.26 days. Between HD (n=93, 54.1%) and CVVHDF (n=78, 45. 3%) groups age, gender, associated co-morbidities and hospital stay days did not differ significantly. Logistic regression analysis revealed that sepsis and cardiological disorders, average arterial pressure (MAP) <75 mmHg, high SAPS II scores, use of vasopressors and inotropes, high lactate levels, and urinary output of <0.25 ml/kg/h were associated with the choice of CRRT. DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSION: The factors suggesting the choice of RRT modality type in ICU are not clear. We emphasized that some parameters related to patient's demographics, clinics and laboratory data affect the clinic's choice.

Anahtar Kelimeler:

Atıf Yapanlar
Dikkat!
Yayınların atıflarını görmek için Sobiad'a Üye Bir Üniversite Ağından erişim sağlamalısınız. Kurumuzun Sobiad'a üye olması için Kütüphane ve Dokümantasyon Daire Başkanlığı ile iletişim kurabilirsiniz.
Kampüs Dışı Erişim
Eğer Sobiad Abonesi bir kuruma bağlıysanız kurum dışı erişim için Giriş Yap Panelini kullanabilirsiniz. Kurumsal E-Mail adresiniz ile kolayca üye olup giriş yapabilirsiniz.
Benzer Makaleler












Tepecik Eğitim ve Araştırma Hastanesi Dergisi

Alan :   Sağlık Bilimleri

Dergi Türü :   Ulusal

Metrikler
Makale : 985
Atıf : 191
2023 Impact/Etki : 0.094
Tepecik Eğitim ve Araştırma Hastanesi Dergisi