Özet:

The need to shape reactor cores in terms of coolant flow distributions arises due to the requirements for temperature fields in the core elements (Safety guide No. NS-G-1.12. 2005, IAEA nuclear energy series No. NP-T-2.9. 2014, Specific safety requirements No. SSR-2/1 (Rev.1) 2014). However, any reactor core shaping inevitably leads to an increase in the core pressure drop and power consumption to ensure the primary coolant circulation. This naturally makes it necessary to select a shaping principle (condition) and install heat exchange intensifiers to meet the safety requirements at the lowest power consumption for the coolant pumping. The result of shaping a nuclear reactor core with identical cooling channels can be predicted at a quality level without detailed calculations. Therefore, it is not normally difficult to select a shaping principle in this case, and detailed calculations are required only where local heat exchange intensifiers are installed. The situation is different if a core has cooling channels of different geometries. In this case, it will be unavoidable to make a detailed calculation of the effects of shaping and heat transfer intensifiers on changes in temperature fields. The aim of this paper is to determine changes in the maximum wall temperatures in cooling channels of high-temperature gas-cooled reactors using the combined effects of shaped coolant mass flows and heat exchange intensifiers installed into the channels. Various shaping conditions have been considered. The authors present the calculated dependences and the procedure for determining the thermal coolant parameters and maximum temperatures of heat exchange surface walls in a system of parallel cooling channels. Variant calculations of the GT-MHR core (NRC project No. 716 2002, Vasyaev et al. 2001, Neylan et al. 1994) with cooling channels of different diameters were carried out. Distributions of coolant flows and temperatures in cooling channels under various shaping conditions were determined using local resistances and heat exchange intensifiers. Preferred options were identified that provide the lowest maximum wall temperature of the most heat-stressed channel at the lowest core pressure drop. The calculation procedure was verified by direct comparison of the results calculated by the proposed algorithm with the CFD simulation results (ANSYS Fluent User’s Guide 2016, ANSYS Fluent. Customization Manual 2016, ANSYS Fluent. Theory Guide 2016, Shaw1992, Anderson et al. 2009, Petrila and Trif 2005, Mohammadi and Pironneau 1994).

Anahtar Kelimeler: