Özet:

The purpose of this intersection is to reveal the teachers’ opinions on the audit of the Turkish course and to develop suggestions so that the audit of the course can be done effectively. It’s in the midst, and it’s in the midst, and it’s in the midst. The Çalıs ̧ma group consists of 21 Turkish teachers working in the secondary schools in the Usküdar district of Istanbul in the 2018-2019 educational year and providing voluntary participation. A semi-configured visual form was developed by the interfacer to collect data. In the processing of data, the content analysis technique is used. The characteristics of the participants are expressed. The Turkish teachers believe that the short term of the general audit process is a negative factor. They stated that such inspection could not exceed the inspection of documents and that the teacher's performance was not assessed. School managers are insufficient to carry out their supervisory tasks. The inspectors should be experts in the Turkish field. However, during the inspection, they said they did not receive guidance from the school managers who inspected. After the examination, the school managers said they did not return to the examination. They also suggested that this should be done. They also emphasized that, in addition to the school manager, educational inspectors should be appointed for inspection. The educational supervisors to perform this task have suggested that they should be well-educated persons in the field of audit with ethical values and strong human values and communication skills. The auditors said that it is important for the educational supervisors to have a graduate education and they added that they should know a foreign language as a suggestion.

Özet:

Abstract The aim of this study is to reveal the opinions of teachers about the audit of the Turkish course and to develop suggestions for effective supervision of the course. The research is a qualitative research design and is a case study. The study group consisted of 21 Turkish teachers working in secondary schools in Üsküdar district of Istanbul province in the 2018-2019 academic year and providing voluntary participation. A semi-structured interview form was developed by the researcher to collect data. Content analysis technique was used to analyze the data. The characteristics of the participants were described descriptively. The Turkish teachers think that the short time period of the general evaluation process is a negative factor. They stated that such an audit could not go beyond auditing documents and that the teacher's performance was not evaluated. They believe that school administrators are inadequate to carry out the supervision. They emphasized that the auditors should be experts in the Turkish field. However, during the audit, they stated that they could not get guidance from the school administrators who carried out the audit. After the audit, they stated that the school administrators did not give feedback about the audit. They also proposed that these should be done. They also emphasized the need for the appointment of education inspectors outside the school administrator for audit. They suggested that the education inspectors who will perform this task should be internalized ethical values and well-educated people in the field of audit with strong human values and communication competence. They stated that it is important that the education inspectors to carry out the audit have graduate education and added that they should know a foreign language as a suggestion.

Anahtar Kelimeler: