Kullanım Kılavuzu
Neden sadece 3 sonuç görüntüleyebiliyorum?
Sadece üye olan kurumların ağından bağlandığınız da tüm sonuçları görüntüleyebilirsiniz. Üye olmayan kurumlar için kurum yetkililerinin başvurması durumunda 1 aylık ücretsiz deneme sürümü açmaktayız.
Benim olmayan çok sonuç geliyor?
Birçok kaynakça da atıflar "Soyad, İ" olarak gösterildiği için özellikle Soyad ve isminin baş harfi aynı olan akademisyenlerin atıfları zaman zaman karışabilmektedir. Bu sorun tüm dünyadaki atıf dizinlerinin sıkça karşılaştığı bir sorundur.
Sadece ilgili makaleme yapılan atıfları nasıl görebilirim?
Makalenizin ismini arattıktan sonra detaylar kısmına bastığınız anda seçtiğiniz makaleye yapılan atıfları görebilirsiniz.
 ASOS INDEKS
 Görüntüleme 12
 İndirme 2
Mustafa Rüşdî’nin Nahl Sûresi 90. Âyetin Tefsirinin Tahkiki
2019
Dergi:  
Tahkik İslami İlimler Araştırma ve Neşir Dergisi
Yazar:  
Özet:

In Islamic history, Muslim scholars have interpreted the Quran from many different aspects. Most of the books on tafsīr (Quranic exegesis) are in the form of ‘complete’ tafsīrs, i.e. from Śūra al-Fātiĥa, the first chapter of the Quran, to Śūra al-Nas, the last chapter. Besides, there are also other commentaries on specially distinct chapters and passages in the Quran. One of the most interpreted passages is the renowned Āya al-Kursī in Śūra al-Baqara. Another one is Śūra al-Naĥl, Āya 90. This study examines one of four separate works written on Śūra al-Naĥl, Āya 90. All of the works are located in different libraries and remain in manuscript form. One of these treatises includes Muśŧafā Rushdī’s commentary. Only one known manuscript of the treatise is extant and is registered in the Süleymaniye Library under the name Tafsīr Āya Inna Allāh Ya’muru bi’l-‘Adl wa al-Iĥsān. In this treatise, written in Arabic, the author mentions the names of three scholars as his sources: Qāđī Bayđāwī, Rūmī and Ibn al-‘Arabī. This study consists of two sections. In the first section, I provide general information about commentaries on the specially distinct passages of the Quran that were written in classical times as well as in the present. Unfortunately, we find no substantial information about the life of the author. Rushdī seems to have lived during the time of the Ottoman Sultan Bayazid II. A list of his works can be found in the first page of the small corpus, which also contains all the treatises he wrote. In the second section of this study is where I present a critically edited version of the manuscript. As for Rushdī’s commentary, it consists of an introduction and two sections. The author in the introduction writes that, “The universal order depends on the order of humankind. Matters of humankind are not regulated other than by politics. Politics is not sensible except through leadership (riyāsa). Presidency is not actualized with the exception of wisdom (dirāya) and piety (diyāna). Because, without them, governorship and patronage (siyāna) remain incomplete.” Following these literary phrases, Rushdī praises the Sultan by saying that, “Sultan Bayazid Khan is the Son of the Sultans.” In the first section of the commentary, Rushdī interprets all the words and expressions in the passage one by one. At the end, he says that all these are in accord with the juristic scholars and other exegetical commentators. This section is considerably short as compared with the later section.Rushdī starts the second section with the statement, “According to Ahl al-ishāra from amongst experts and specialists,” which is in reference to Sufi scholars who interpreted the Quran beyond its exoteric meaning, i.e. tafsīr bi’l-ishāra. He implies that he will interpret the passage from an esoteric standpoint, unlike the interpretations of the jurists and other scholars from Ahl al-žāhir who pursue its literal meanings. Rushdī then mentions “three positions” of a ruler (mālik) as, “the things between himself and his desires (nafs),” “the things between himself and his people”, and “the things between himself and Allah.” Afterwards, he treats these topics in three small chapters. He explains the terms from the ruler’s point of view in the first one, from the people’s point of view in the second, and from Allah’s point of view in the last one. Towards the end of the treatise, he excerpts from Jalāl al-Dīn al-Rūmī and Muĥyī al-Dīn ibn al-‘Arabī. The commentary ends with a supplication to Allah.Muśŧafā Rushdī has four other works besides this treatise on tafsīr which are as follows: 1- Fađāil-i Shūra. Istanbul: Süleymaniye Library, located in Hasan Husnu Pasha Collection, 648, 4a. 2- Nāma-i Tablighiyya. Istanbul: Süleymaniye Library, located in Hasan Husnu Pasha Collection, 648, 1b. 3- Tuhfa al-Mulūk wa al-Śalātīn: Istanbul: Süleymaniye Library, located in Hasan Husnu Pasha Collection, 648, 16-88. 4- Al-Āyat al-Dālla ‘alā Ādam Jawāz Muwāla al-Kuffār wa al-Nahy ‘anhu. Istanbul: Süleymaniye Library, located in Hasan Husnu Pasha Collection, 648, 4b.

Anahtar Kelimeler:

Atıf Yapanlar
Bilgi: Bu yayına herhangi bir atıf yapılmamıştır.
Benzer Makaleler
Tahkik İslami İlimler Araştırma ve Neşir Dergisi

Dergi Türü :   Uluslararası

Tahkik İslami İlimler Araştırma ve Neşir Dergisi