User Guide
Why can I only view 3 results?
You can also view all results when you are connected from the network of member institutions only. For non-member institutions, we are opening a 1-month free trial version if institution officials apply.
So many results that aren't mine?
References in many bibliographies are sometimes referred to as "Surname, I", so the citations of academics whose Surname and initials are the same may occasionally interfere. This problem is often the case with citation indexes all over the world.
How can I see only citations to my article?
After searching the name of your article, you can see the references to the article you selected as soon as you click on the details section.
 Views 19
 Downloands 1
Left ventricular ejection fraction, end-systolic and end-diastolic volume values in female with normal gated myocardial perfusion spect: the comparison with 4dm-spect and Siemens Icon®-Qgs
2018
Journal:  
Journal of Contemporary Medicine
Author:  
Abstract:

Abstract Gated myocardial perfusion SPECT (g-MPS) is an important method in the diagnosis of coronary artery disease (CAD). Left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF), end-systolic volume (ESV) and end-diastolic volume (EDV) are required parameters for evaluation of cardiac performance. Our aim is to compare LVEF and volume values and to determine normal limits in patients with normal myocardial perfusion using two (4D-MSPECT ve SIEMENS ICON® QGS)computer software programs.   Patients and Methods One hundred nine females were included study with the suspicion of CAD but their g-MPS was reported as normal between October 2004 and February 2007. Single day rest-stress g-MPS protocol was applied. Modified Bruce protocol was done for effort test with tredmill performance or dobutamine injection for pharmacological effort. Reconstruction was performed via Butterworth filtration without attenuation correction. LVEF, ESV and EDV were calculated.   Results The mean rest (REF) and stress (SEF) ejection fraction values between 4DM and QGS algorithms had significant differeneces statistically (∆REF[4DM-QGS])=9.5; ∆SEF[4DM-QGS]=8.9; p<0.05). Wide Blandt Alman limits (BAL) were detected among the results (BAL:[4DM-REF]-[QGS-REF]=26.4-(-7.8), R=0,61 P<0,05; 4DM-SEF-QGS-SEF:27.7-(-10.1), R=0,54; P=0,000). Significant differences (p<0.05) were found beside the strong correlation coefficient values (r=0.81-0.93) in the volumes.   Conclusion There were significant differences in the averages between the two g-MPS software program in LEVF and volume values so they should not be used in place of each other at the follow-up of patients. 

Keywords:

Citation Owners
Information: There is no ciation to this publication.
Similar Articles












Journal of Contemporary Medicine

Field :   Sağlık Bilimleri

Journal Type :   Uluslararası

Metrics
Article : 1.263
Cite : 1.265
2023 Impact : 0.025
Journal of Contemporary Medicine